| Model Number |
G146 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631); Data Problem (3196)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Syncope/Fainting (4411)
|
| Date of Event |
04/16/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) showed the clock off one hour which was related to daylight savings time, so the device was working as expected.Furthermore, the device had a syncopal episode with no report of shock and other ventricular arrhythmia episode which had anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) and an electric shock.The electrogram showed device operating as programmed and recent lead tests are within normal limits.The crt-d remains in service.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) showed the clock off one hour which was related to daylight savings time, so the device was working as expected.Furthermore, the device had a syncopal episode with no report of shock and other ventricular arrhythmia episode which had anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) and an electric shock.The electrogram showed device operating as programmed and recent lead tests are within normal limits.The crt-d remains in service.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The returned device was inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory.Visual examination of the device header and case noted no anomalies.Pacing and sensing functions were tested and the device was verified to operate as expected.Analysis did not identify any device characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.\
\
a review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.\
\
a risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of data issue was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.\
\
review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.\
\
based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, the conclusion code no problem detected was selected.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) showed the clock off one hour which was related to daylight savings time, so the device was working as expected.Furthermore, the device had a syncopal episode with no report of shock and other ventricular arrhythmia episode which had anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) and an electric shock.The electrogram showed device operating as programmed and recent lead tests are within normal limits.The crt-d has been explanted due to normal battery depletion and has been returned for analysis without additional allegations.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|