• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US REUSE PATIENT SET FMS 24PK; ARTHROSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US REUSE PATIENT SET FMS 24PK; ARTHROSCOPE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 284649
Medical Device Problem Codes Leak/Splash (1354); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/28/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: h4: unknown at this time udi: ((b)(4) investigation summary: the photo investigation revealed that reuse patient set fms 24pk was in the packaging tray.The device had water residues.No anomalies could be observed.The overall complaint was unconfirmed as the observed condition of the reuse patient set fms 24pk would not contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause for the reported condition is traced to the procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during the system set up.Multiple factors are associated with this type of failure, the complaint device needs to be physically evaluated in order to determine why the customer experienced the failure, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an unspecified surgical procedure the reuse patient set fms device and the inflow tubing fms vue devices were being used when the two hoses did not allow the pump to work and the water was dumped or watered, which is why we had to open the other two spare hoses so that the pump could start and function correctly, which delayed the surgery for approximately 1 hour, the time in which the pump and hoses were tested until they worked correctly.The surgery was finally completed successfully but with effects on the patient since it was necessary to extend his anesthesia times.Yes, the patient was affected since it was necessary to intraoperatively extend his anesthesia times due to the delay of approximately 1 hour in surgery.No additional information was provided.This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: h4: added udi: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: investigation summary: the product was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.Visual inspection of the returned device found it was in used condition.Signs of saline solution could be observed on the inside of the device.No other anomalies could be observed.A functional test was performed by connecting the tubbing to a fms pump, the tubbing was set up.When activating the pump, a leak could be observed at the proximal end on the connector.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the reuse patient set fms 24pk would have contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to the procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during the system set up.It is possible that the connector thread got damaged during assembly for the setup, therefore causing the leak.As per the instructions for use, to avoid damage to the tubing make sure that tubing is centered on the groove of the pump.Waste line is intended to connect to waste bag and is not approved for external suction systems.If external suction device is used, tubing may collapse.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 3005336, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REUSE PATIENT SET FMS 24PK
Common Device Name
ARTHROSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key19276406
Report Number1221934-2024-01537
Device Sequence Number6339104
Product Code HRX
UDI-Device Identifier10886705023233
UDI-Public10886705023233
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCO
PMA/510(K) Number
K951843
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/09/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/30/2024
Device Catalogue Number284649
Device Lot Number3005336
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/29/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/10/2024
03/25/2025
03/31/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/09/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/12/2024
03/25/2025
03/31/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/20/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-