• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 56MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 56MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 74120156
Medical Device Problem Code Biocompatibility (2886)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Date of Event 11/14/2016
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, a plaintiff that underwent a right bhr procedure on (b)(6) 2012, was found to have metal debris and pseudotumors in their right knee, via an mri on (b)(6) 2016.Therefore, a revision was performed on (b)(6) 2016 to treat this adverse event, during which the bhr acetabular and femoral components were exchanged for a zimmer ceramic-ceramic system.Patient's current health status in unknown.No other complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that, a patient that underwent a right bhr procedure, was found to have metal debris and pseudotumors in their right hip, via an mri.Therefore, a revision was performed to treat this adverse event, during which the bhr acetabular and femoral components were exchanged for a ceramic-ceramic system.Patient's current health status in unknown.No other complications were reported.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the alleged devices was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.No other similar complaints have been identified for the cup and head, and this failure will continue to be monitored.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified.The available medical documents were reviewed.Based on the limited information provided a clinical root cause for the hypointense collection, with the presence of debris, noted on mri cannot be confirmed.It cannot be concluded the reported event was associated with a mal performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the reported revision could not be determined.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACETLR CUP HAP 56MM W/ IMPTR
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key19279187
Report Number3005975929-2024-00048
Device Sequence Number15379264
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010502599
UDI-Public03596010502599
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
P040033
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2012
Device Explanted Year2016
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Consumer,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/09/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/23/2016
Device Catalogue Number74120156
Device Lot Number11HW15078
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/19/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/04/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/09/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/09/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/23/2011
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device A
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
PN: 74121150 / LOT: 11JW13991
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-