|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPICC SOLO 4F SL MAX BARRIER PLUS KIT W/GUARDIVA, PROBE COVER; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
| Date of Event |
04/18/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by customer that they noted leaking at the insertion site.There was a picc lumen that a horizonal split at the 7cm mark.Picc placed on (b)(6) 24 by picc rn.Rn stated no issues with placement.Patient was discharged home on (b)(6) 24 with the picc line.Picc line was working at time of discharge.Patient came back into the ed on (b)(6) 24 due to his home health nurse being unable to obtain blood return from the picc lumen and reported difficulty flushing the line.The ed confirmed in the chart that upon arrival the picc lumen was not working properly.Cathflo was given in the ed and the nurse reported that the line flushed and drew blood.Patient was discharged home.Patient arrived to the ed on (b)(6) 24 due to the picc line leaking.Patient reported that he has been getting daily abx with no pain or difficulty flushing the line.However, patient reported that the home health nurses were stating "blood return difficulties".The vascular access team was consulted to the ed.When rn arrived, they noticed no leaking at the site when flushed.After re-dressing the line they noted leaking at the insertion site and also noted swelling around the insertion site that appeared to be infiltrated.The picc line was removed from the patients arm.The picc was flushed (outside of the patients arm) and they noted a horizontal split along the 7cm mark.On initial placement, charting showed 0cm left out.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The complaint of a catheter fracture was confirmed.The product returned for evaluation was one 4fr sl powerpicc solo catheter.The investigation findings are consistent with damage accumulated through flexural fatigue.Flexural fatigue occurs due to cyclic kinking of the catheter tube in which physiological, placement, usage, and mechanical factors may gradually form a crack(s) in the catheter.The returned product sample was evaluated and a split was observed between the 6cm and 7cm depth markers.The catheter split contained physical features associated with material fatigue, and the characteristics observed which supported this type of failure included: ¿ damage which was circumferentially aligned ¿ fracture edges which were rounded and polished due to repeated material wear ¿ 'c' shaped impressions leading into the fracture site which are consistent with material buckling due to movement which caused the fracture edges to be pressed together ¿ overall elliptical shape to the fracture cross-section (a result of repeated kinking of the tubing) an examination of the catheter structure revealed no potential damage/defect related to manufacture of the product.The damage location suggested that catheter securement, access and maintenance techniques may have contributed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by customer that they noted leaking at the insertion site.There was a picc lumen that a horizonal split at the 7cm mark.Picc placed on (b)(6) 2024 by picc rn.Rn stated no issues with placement.Patient was discharged home on (b)(6) 2024 with the picc line.Picc line was working at time of discharge.Patient came back into the ed on (b)(6) 2024 due to his home health nurse being unable to obtain blood return from the picc lumen and reported difficulty flushing the line.The ed confirmed in the chart that upon arrival the picc lumen was not working properly.Cathflo was given in the ed and the nurse reported that the line flushed and drew blood.Patient was discharged home.Patient arrived to the ed on (b)(6) 2024 due to the picc line leaking.Patient reported that he has been getting daily abx with no pain or difficulty flushing the line.However, patient reported that the home health nurses were stating "blood return difficulties".The vascular access team was consulted to the ed.When rn arrived, they noticed no leaking at the site when flushed.After re-dressing the line they noted leaking at the insertion site and also noted swelling around the insertion site that appeared to be infiltrated.The picc line was removed from the patients arm.The picc was flushed (outside of the patients arm) and they noted a horizontal split along the 7cm mark.On initial placement, charting showed 0cm left out.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|