|
Corrected information: d9.Yes, returned to manufacturer on 05/24/2024.H3.Yes.H6.Type of investigation: 10, 3331.Investigation findings: 3243, 3252.Investigation conclusion: 19.Device evaluation: two tulip heads and one screw shank returned for evaluation.The shank is fractured through the neck and into the base of the shank sphere.The shank head is immobile and has slight deformation on the distal face of the tulip.It is likely the construct load path traveled through the neck instead of through the friction lock between shank head and tulip.This could be a result of repeated cyclic loading to the neck beyond the performance loads for which it was designed.The 2nd tulip appears to have been locked down in an orientation as intended with the friction lock between shank head and tulip taking load.After the initial screw fractured, all the construct loading was placed on the 2nd screw causing it to break.The original screw trajectory and location are unknown.The supporting construct details and patient medical history are also unknown.Based on the available information, the root cause is likely a result of the excessive loading.Labeling review: warnings/cautions/precautions: risks identified with the use of these devices, which may require additional surgery, include device component failure, loss of fixation/stabilization, non-union, vertebral fracture, neurological injury, vascular or visceral injury.Possible adverse effects: initial or delayed loosening, disassembly, bending, dislocation, and/or breakage of device components.Postoperative management: immobilization should be considered in order to prevent bending, dislocation, or breakage of the implant device in the case of delayed, mal-union, or non-union of bone.Immobilization should continue until a complete bone fusion mass has developed and been confirmed.
|