| Catalog Number |
MBL-U-10 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Failure to Fire (2610)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/03/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation evaluation: a product evaluation was not performed in response to this report because the product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.The report could not be confirmed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: we could not conduct a complete investigation because the product said to be involved was not returned for evaluation.A definitive cause for the reported observation could not be determined.Band deployment difficulty can occur if the endoscope accessory channel is compromised.In these cases, the endoscope accessory channel collapses, restricting the trigger cord and preventing proper band deployment.The instructions for use contain the following statement: "use of an endoscope in a sound state of repair is a prerequisite for a successful multi-band ligation procedure." band deployment difficulty can also occur if the trigger cord is not properly seated in the handle assembly.The instructions for use advise the user: "note: knot must be seated into hole or handle will not function properly." a precaution in the instructions for use state: "it is vital that the integrity of the working channel is intact as grooves or other obstructions in the working channel can potentially cause the string to catch, resulting in band deployment difficulty." it is possible that this could lead to band deployment difficulty and damage to the trigger cord as well.Prior to distribution, all 10 shooter saeed multi-band ligator are subjected to a visual inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During an esophageal variceal ligation, the physician used a cook 10 shooter saeed multi-band ligator.It was reported that the user installed the mbl-u-10 device onto olympus gifh260 endoscope, then advanced the endoscope to patient's esophageal for ligation.The user successfully released the first 5 bands but the sixth band could not be deployed.User changed to another same device to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation evaluation: the product said to be involved was returned in an open box/tray from the lot number provided in the report.The label matches the product returned.All components, except a few bands, were included in the return.Our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved confirmed that one leg of the trigger cord remaining on the barrel had broken; all of the trigger cord was returned.This is the most likely reason the remaining bands could not be deployed, confirming the customer's complaint.The trigger cord was examined and all 12 deployment beads were present on the cord legs.One leg of the trigger cord was broken at approximately 139.8cm and the other side was fully intact.The beads could not be verified for correct location as the trigger cord was broken and still attached to the barrel.The beads were examined using magnification and found to be correctly filled and had no evidence of excess flash.The length of the trigger cord was measured between the knots and was within the tolerance.An evaluation of the handle wheel movement was performed and the wheel functioned as intended.A product-specific discrepancy that could have caused or contributed to this observation was not observed during our laboratory analysis.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: our laboratory evaluation of the device confirmed the report; one leg of the trigger cord on the barrel was found to be broken.A definitive cause for this observation could not be determined because the actual use conditions could not be duplicated in the laboratory setting.Due to a variety of clinical conditions such as patient anatomy, endoscope position or progression of disease state, we could not reproduce the actual conditions of product usage during our laboratory analysis.This limits our ability to conclusively determine a cause.If extreme pressure was applied to the handle in response to resistance this could contribute to trigger cord breakage.Trigger cord breakage can occur if the endoscope accessory channel is compromised.In these cases, the endoscope accessory channel collapses, restricting the trigger cord and preventing proper band deployment.The instructions for use contain the following statement: "use of an endoscope in a sound state of repair is a prerequisite for a successful multi-band ligation procedure." prior to distribution, all 10 shooter saeed multi-band ligator are subjected to a visual inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|