• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZIMMER DENTAL IMPL SCR-V MINI SBM 3.3MM 3.5MM 10MM; DENTAL IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZIMMER DENTAL IMPL SCR-V MINI SBM 3.3MM 3.5MM 10MM; DENTAL IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SVMB10
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Osteolysis (2377)
Date of Event 05/01/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4), a2: age and date of birth unknown / not provided.A4: patient weight unknown / not provided.G4: pma/510(k) number k011028, k013227.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the implant in tooth site #36 was removed due to bone loss.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Similar complaints for bone loss related problems have been previously investigated.Visual and dimensional evaluations of the previously returned product have not identified or suggested manufacturing non-conformances.Furthermore, the probability of manufacturing or design defects that might lead to bone loss escaping the available detections is remote and almost nonexistent.Zimvie quality management system (qms) has controls in place to ensure the distribution of conforming product.Additionally, all device history record reviews verified that each implant was sterilized per procedure for every device.All complaint data used for the summary investigation was found to be conforming and did not meet capa/hhe/d/ or any further escalations.Therefore, there were no complaints which confirmed a manufacturing or design related issue that did or could cause or contribute to the reported event.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number 63687670.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number 63687670 for similar events and three other complaints were identified ((b)(4)).Review completed utilizing keywords: ¿bone loss.¿ as documented in the summary investigation, contributing factors for the reported event likely exist outside of zimvie control, including those related to medical conditions / patient habits and surgical technique.Based on the summary investigation, no malfunction occurred upon investigation and no association between the dental implant and bone loss was found that can explain these events.Therefore, the reported event remains non-verifiable as it is a medical condition.Monthly trending to date has not identified any statistical triggers suggesting potential design or manufacturing related issues.Previously completed investigations for bone loss problems reported in association with implant failure have not identified any signals indicating potential non-conformances impacting the manufacturing and sterilization processes.Therefore, escalation to capa is not required.At this time, the complaint investigation has been completed and the record will be closed.If additional information is received, the record will be re-opened for further evaluation.The following sections have been updated: b4: date of this report g3: date received by manufacturer g6: checked "follow-up" h3: changed "yes" to "no" h6: entered evaluation codes h10: added manufacturer narrative h3 other text: device was not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
No further event information available at the time of this report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Similar complaints for bone loss related problems have been previously investigated.Refer to attached summary investigation.Visual and dimensional evaluations of the previously returned product have not identified or suggested manufacturing non-conformances.Furthermore, the probability of manufacturing or design defects that might lead to bone loss escaping the available detections is remote and almost nonexistent.Zimvie quality management system (qms) has controls in place to ensure the distribution of conforming product.Additionally, all device history record reviews verified that each implant was sterilized per procedure for every device.All complaint data used for the summary investigation was found to be conforming and did not meet capa/hhe/d/ or any further escalations.Therefore, there were no complaints which confirmed a manufacturing or design related issue that did or could cause or contribute to the reported event.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number 63687670.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number 63687670 for similar events and three other complaints were identified (cmp-55233-2024, cmp-55234-2024, cmp-55256-2024).Review completed utilizing keywords: ¿bone loss.¿ as documented in the summary investigation, contributing factors for the reported event likely exist outside of zimvie control, including those related to medical conditions / patient habits and surgical technique.Based on the summary investigation, no malfunction occurred upon investigation and no association between the dental implant and bone loss was found that can explain these events.Therefore, the reported event remains non-verifiable as it is a medical condition.Monthly trending to date has not identified any statistical triggers suggesting potential design or manufacturing related issues.Previously completed investigations for bone loss problems reported in association with implant failure have not identified any signals indicating potential non-conformances impacting the manufacturing and sterilization processes.Therefore, escalation to capa is not required.At this time, the complaint investigation has been completed and the record will be closed.If additional information is received, the record will be re-opened for further evaluation.The following sections have been updated: b4: date of this report d9: device availability g3: date received by manufacturer g6: checked "follow-up" h2: checked follow-up type h3: changed "no" to "yes" h6: entered evaluation codes h10: added manufacturer narrative.
 
Event or Problem Description
No further event information available at the time of this report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPL SCR-V MINI SBM 3.3MM 3.5MM 10MM
Common Device Name
DENTAL IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZIMMER DENTAL
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens FL 33410
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZIMMER DENTAL
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens FL 33410
Manufacturer Contact
carlos gordian-arroyo
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens, FL 33410
5619713230
MDR Report Key19315528
Report Number0002023141-2024-01603
Device Sequence Number6816567
Product Code DZE
UDI-Device Identifier00889024018129
UDI-Public(01)00889024018129(17)220731(10)63687670
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCI
PMA/510(K) Number
K061410
Exemption Number5645646
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/23/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/30/2022
Device Catalogue NumberSVMB10
Device Lot Number63687670
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/14/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/06/2024
10/24/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/23/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-