|
MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR CPX 4 BREAST TISSUE EXPANDER WITH SUTURE TABS; EXPANDER, SKIN, INFLATABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
3549113 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Capsular Contracture (1761)
|
| Date of Event |
03/16/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: capsular contracture/deflation mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient who had a 450cc mentor cpx 4 breast tissue expander with suture tabs placed experienced right sided baker grade iv capsular contracture and right sided deflation post procedure.As a result, explant was performed on (b)(6) 2024.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The impacted product was received by the failure analysis lab on june 12, 2024.The investigation of the returned device was completed by the failure analysis lab on june 19, 2024.Device evaluation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection, leak testing, and microscopic examination of the returned device.During visual analysis of the returned sample, no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed.Leak testing was performed according to mentor procedures, and it was noted a tear between the union of the shell and the bladder.Microscopic examination was performed, and the cause of the tear could not be identified.The patient should be advised that vigorous body movement (e.G., physical exercise) or excessive manipulation or trauma in the region of the expander may cause stress to the device and result in subsequent deflation.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|