• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. FRED X27; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. FRED X27; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number FREDX3513
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Headache (1880); Blurred Vision (2137)
Date of Event 03/21/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
As reported by the fred x pas clinical study: patient experienced dizziness and pain behind left eye.Patient did not report it to the hospital prior to discharge.The severity was classified as mild, and the event was classified as not a serious adverse event by the study site.The event was resolved two weeks later.A month after the patient experienced dizziness and pain behind left eye, patient presents as transfer from another ed after presenting with complaints of acute onset headache and blurry vision of left eye.Patient was hospitalized for a day.Ct and mri were performed with negative acute findings and negative device malfunction findings.The ct did note that the petrous and cavernous ica on the left is smaller than that on the right and smaller than the ct examination conducted three weeks ago.It was reported by the clinical staff that there is a possible relationship of the study device to the reported adverse event as the stent was placed on the left supraclinoid and patient has had multiple left sided headache episodes with pain behind left eye reported since the index procedure.The adverse event is not related to the procedure.Patient has a history of severe posterior headaches and left temporal headaches with double/blurry vision.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Visual analysis: a visual inspection of the device captured in this file could not be performed as a physical device was not returned for evaluation, nor were any images of the device provided in place of a device return.Procedure and medical imaging was not provided for this investigation.Investigation findings: without the return and physical evaluation of the device, the investigation cannot definitively determine if a condition existed that would have caused or contributed to the reported event.Without imaging, the investigation cannot verify the event occurred as described, nor could the investigation definitively determine the cause of the reported event.Based on a review of the device¿s risk documentation, the reported event did not indicate there were any potential or new manufacturing, design, quality, or other systemic issues, or non-conformances.The complaint code is monitored through the trending process; corrective action is determined, as needed, through this process.Investigations of historic complaint files with similar complaint category coding are recorded in the complaint handling system; without the ability to perform and analysis of the device, this investigation cannot identify with certainty any potential root causes.Batch review: a search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.Complaint system review: there are no similar complaints based on the complaint category regarding this batch number from the last two years recorded in the complaint system at the time of this investigation.Ifu review: potential complications below is a list of the probable adverse effects (e.G., complications) associated with the use of neurovascular flow diverting stents.Allergic reaction, including but not limited to: contrast dye, nitinol metal, and any other medications used during the procedure.Amaurosis fugax or transient blindness.Aphasia, blindness.Cardiac arrhythmia.Complications of arterial puncture including pain, local bleeding, or injury to the artery, or adjacent nerves.Cranial neuropathy, death, device fracture, migration or misplacement diplopia dissection or perforation of the parent artery headache hemiplegia hemorrhage, including intracranial hemorrhage (ich), subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah), and retroperitoneal hydrocephalus infection mass effect myocardial infarction neurological deficits pseudoaneurysm formation reactions to anti-platelet or anti-coagulant agents reactions due to radiation exposure, including alopecia, burns ranging in severity from skin reddening to ulcers, cataracts, and delayed neoplasia.Reactions to anesthesia and related procedures, reactions to contrast agents including allergic reactions and kidney failure reduced visual acuity or visual field, retinal artery occlusion or infarction, retinal ischemia, rupture or perforation of the aneurysm, stenosis of stented segment, seizure, stent thrombosis, stroke or tia (transient ischemic attack), thromboembolic event, vasospasm, visual impairment.Warnings the fred-27 system should only be delivered through a headway 27 microcatheter and the fred-21 system should only be delivered through a headway 21 microcatheter.If repeated friction is encountered during fred system delivery, verify microcatheter is not kinked or in extremely tortuous anatomy.Confirm that the microcatheter does not ovalize.Confirm that there is adequate sterile heparinized flush solution.Do not reposition the fred system in the parent vessel without fully retrieving the device.The fred system must be retrieved/re-sheathed into the microcatheter and re-deployed at the desired target location or removed completely from the patient.The fred system must not be re-deployed more than three times.Should unusual resistance be felt at any time during access or removal, the introducer/guide catheter/microcatheter and fred system should be removed as a single unit.Applying excessive force during delivery or retrieval of the fred system can potentially result in loss or damage to the device and delivery components.The fred system delivery wire should not be utilized as a guidewire.Do not torque the fred system.A torque device should not be used.Directions for use: 17.Advance the delivery wire to transfer the fred system from within the introducer into the microcatheter.18.Warning: do not torque the delivery wire while advancing or retracting the fred system.21.Warning: do not apply undue force.If resistance is encountered at any point during delivery or manipulation, withdraw the unit and select a new fred system.23.Position the fred system for deployment by aligning the fred system implant distal radiopaque end markers past the aneurysm neck, allowing for adequate distal and proximal device landing zones as shown in the following figures for fred-27 system and fred-21 system.26.Note: a slow, proper push/pull technique, encompassing sufficient delivery wire push force, in addition to an opposing microcatheter withdrawal force, to remove excess microcatheter slack while maintaining the microcatheter tip within the center of the parent vessel, will facilitate properly deploying the fred system at the proper location, to achieve full expansion and good vessel apposition.27.Caution: using a rapid microcatheter withdrawal technique to deploy the fred system is not recommended and may result in device elongation or improper deployment.Be aware of delivery wire tip position during deployment.28.If the fred system positioning is not satisfactory, the implant may be recaptured and repositioned if it is not fully deployed.The implant may be recaptured until the point where the distal-most wire marker, collocated distal to the implant proximal markers, is aligned approximately 50% of length proximal to the microcatheter distal marker band.29.Caution: if resistance is felt while recapturing the device, do not continue to recapture.Withdraw the microcatheter slightly to unsheath the device (without exceeding the recapture limit), and then attempt to recapture again.30.Caution: the fred system must not be re-deployed more than three times.31.If fred system positioning is satisfactory, carefully advance the delivery wire while retracting the microcatheter as needed to minimize slack, maintaining the microcatheter around the center of the parent vessel, to allow the implant to deploy across the neck of the aneurysm.Ensure the implant proximal radiopaque end markers are in the advised position (see step 23) proximal to the aneurysm neck for adequate coverage.32.Note: the fred system will expand and may foreshorten up to 60% from its undeployed length.Visually verify opening of the proximal end, ensuring that the microcatheter distal tip marker is pulled back, adequately away from the implant proximal end, to allow the proximal end to freely open.Push forward on the delivery wire to assist in maintaining access within the implant as needed.33.Note: visualize and refer to implant radiopaque end markers to maintain adequate implant length on each side of the aneurysm neck/target location to ensure appropriate coverage.34.Warning: do not fully deploy the fred system if positioning in the parent vessel is not satisfactory.37.Carefully inspect the deployed fred implant under fluoroscopy to confirm that it is completely open and opposed to the vessel wall and not kinked.If the implant is not fully open and apposed or is kinked, consider utilizing a suitable micro guidewire and/or occlusion balloon catheter to fully open the implant.38.Caution: carefully watch the fred implant distal and proximal markers when passing through the implanted device with other devices to avoid displacing the implant.The physical device was not available for evaluation to determine if a condition existed that would have caused or contributed to event.Supplemental imaging was also unavailable for review; without imaging, the investigation cannot verify the event occurred as described, nor could the investigation definitively determine the cause of the reported event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FRED X27
Common Device Name
INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key19326358
Report Number2032493-2024-00386
Device Sequence Number2685734
Product Code OUT
UDI-Device Identifier00842429114292
UDI-Public(01)00842429114292(11)220604(17)250531(10)0000198179
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateKY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P180027
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Study,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 05/15/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2025
Device Model NumberFREDX3513
Device Lot Number0000198179
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/24/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/15/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/04/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization;
Patient Age47 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight69 KG
-
-