| Catalog Number |
TMT4B11 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Nerve Damage (1979)
|
| Date of Event |
09/05/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Zimvie complaint (b)(4).A1: patient identifier is not provided / unknown.A4: patient weight is not provided / unknown.E1: initial reporter¿s title is not provided / unknown.G4: additional 510(k) numbers are k113753 and k112160.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the implant wasn't able to be placed due to lack of torque and nerve injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to report additional and corrected information to 0002023141-2024-01636-1.The corrected information is that the product has now been returned to the manufacturer and the investigation was re opened.Zimvie received one implant for evaluation.Visual evaluation of the as returned device identified the implant with signs of use and markings likely due from removal.There was apparent bone debris on its external threads.No damage identified or signs of malfunction that would have contributed to the reported event.Measurements match drawing.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction did not occur.The reported event was non-verifiable with all the available information.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the product was nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional or corrected information to report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional or corrected information to report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to report additional information.The following sections are being reported: d4: expiration date and unique identifier (udi) number.H2: if follow-up, what type.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer.H4: device manufacturer date.H6: type of investigation.H6: investigation findings.H6: investigation conclusions.H10: additional narratives/data.Zimvie did not receive one implant for evaluation.Visual inspection could not be performed.The investigation has been performed based on the available information using the item number, device history record (dhr) review, and risk management file (rmf).Functional testing to recreate the reported event could not be performed due to the nature of the device & event.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root causes determined from the investigation are patient factors, or customer error.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction could not be verified.Without device receipt, the reported event is non-verifiable.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the product was nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|