| Model Number |
20012 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Mechanical Problem (1384); Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/16/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medtronic received information that during use of a dlp¿ aortic root cannulae with vent line, it was reported that the needle would not properly unsheathe or remove (screw off) from the luer portion of the cannula.The hcp stated that apparently, the luer port on the needle as improperly bonded.The device was replaced to complete the procedure.There was no adverse patient effect associated with this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation summary: visual inspection shows the male luer stem of needle introducer appears to have been inadvertently bonded to the female luer during assembly and when it was removed the luer cracked/split.The customer has removed the sharp tip on the introducer.Reason for return was confirmed.Additional information b5.Medtronic received additional information that there was no noticeable damage to the cannula prior to use.The customer mentioned that they broke the needle tip off for safety after they saved it.The device was inserted, the needle was attempted to be removed and the problem was identified.Medtronic received additional information that the same insertion site was used to insert the replaced device.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|