|
The device was not returned for evaluation.Lot history record (lhr) and corrective and preventive actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot specific issue.Based on the reported information, there is no indication that the reported material rupture was related to a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.There were no leaks noted during preparation, which suggests a product quality issue did not contribute to the reported difficulties.In this case, the lesion site was described as mildly calcified, moderately tortuous, and 90% stenosed.It is likely that balloon material was damaged due to interaction with the calcified lesion resulting in material rupture during inflation.
|