• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBYLP0102
Medical Device Problem Codes Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Difficult or Delayed Separation (4044)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/21/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned ruby coil lp confirmed that the embolization coil was detached.Evaluation revealed that the pet lock was fractured on the proximal end of the pusher assembly, and the pull wire was retracted from its original position on the distal tip of the pusher assembly.If the pet lock is separated and the pull wire is retracted from its original position, the embolization coil will detach.Further evaluation revealed kinks along the length of the pusher assembly.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint and the root cause could not be determined.Penumbra devices are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the left colic artery using ruby coil lps, a lp detachment handle (handle), and a non-penumbra microcatheter.It was reported that the patient¿s anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician successfully implanted two ruby coil lps.The next ruby coil lp was advanced using the microcatheter into the target vessel and the physician attempted to detach the coil several times using the handle; however, the ruby coil lp failed to detach.The physician decided to retract the ruby coil lp.While retracting the ruby coil lp, the physician experienced resistance, and the ruby coil lp unintentionally detached within the microcatheter.Therefore, the physician successfully flushed the detached ruby coil lp into the target vessel using a 3cc syringe.The procedure ended at this point.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL LP
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key19345332
Report Number3005168196-2024-00188
Device Sequence Number15651399
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00815948021723
UDI-Public815948021723
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateLA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K192955
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 05/17/2024
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBYLP0102
Device Lot NumberF110282
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/01/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/21/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/17/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/27/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-