| Catalog Number |
405828 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
| Date of Event |
05/11/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Material #: unknown batch#: unknown.It was reported by customer that as you may have heard, we had an epidural catheter sheared off in a patient's back over the weekend.We want to send the catheter to bd for analysis.Do you have the information to do this? to whom do we send it, and how? additional information: please provide material and batch number.Mfr#405828, we don¿t have lot number as outer container wasn¿t saved.¿ any adverse event or serious injury reported to patient or healthcare professional? disclosed to patient that the catheter sheared off.The inner spring coil was removed intact, but the outer 'proprietary blended coating' remained in her back.¿ please confirm whether there was any patient impact.On discharge from labor and delivery, she had no neurologic symptoms, but significant anxiety and concern about the remaining catheter in her back.She will follow up with neurosurgery as an outpatient ¿ any physical sample or photo available for investigation? if yes, are you able to provide the address of the facility for us to ship the return label? yes (b)(6) can you confirm address bd can send the return label to ¿ any picture of this complaint? ¿ please explain product damage.On removal of the epidural catheter, it was noticed that at about 6 cm mark the outer plastic of the epidural was sheared off from the spring coil.The spring coil was removed from the patient's back but the plastic outer sheath remained inside of the patient.¿ what is the actual issue of catheter.The plastic catheter (unsure of its components) in its distal 6cm sheared off from the spring coil and remains inside of the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Initial mdr submission.A follow up mdr will be submitted if additional information, a device evaluation, or a device history review is completed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4) follow up mdr for device evaluation/correction: correction: section h1 type of reportable event updated to reflect serious injury as event is both malfunction and serious injury.Device evaluation: one sample was provided to our quality team for investigation.Through visual inspection, the catheter was observed to be damaged, verifying the reported incident.Product undergoes inspections throughout the manufacturing process to ensure the quality and functionality of the device.As the lot involved in this incident is unknown, a device history review cannot be performed.Based on the available information we were not able to identify a root cause at this time.The sample was forwarded to the supplier for further evaluation.Complaints received for this device and reported condition will continue to be monitored by our quality team for signs of emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|