| Model Number |
DFR00V |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Visual Disturbances (2140); Posterior Capsule Opacification (4807)
|
| Date of Event |
11/15/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Initially, the doctor reported that lots of night glare with the patient's left (os) eye.It was indicated that the patient's uncorrected visual acuity ( ucva ) is 20/50, best corrected visual acuity (bcva) is +0.75 (vague endpoints) achieving a poor-quality 20/30, and she looks otherwise clear, but the doctor had planned to let the left eye go a bit longer before doing anything.The patient had no lasik history and no evident corneal or macular pathology.The patient also denies amblyopia.Additional information received for left eye on (b)(6) 2024 indicated that os visual issues did not improve.They obtained a second opinion and they found os ucva to be 20/25-, near j5, and a manifest bcva of 20/20 with +1.75 sphere.They found no other pathology besides a mild capsular opacity.The patient is generally happy with right eye (od).The doctor found os bcva 20/25 with +1.00+0.25x114.There was better vision distance and near with a +1.25 loose lens over the patient's os.The patient decided to undergo os lens exchange on (b)(6).The explant was performed.This was replaced with the same model 2.0 diopter power higher than the original iol.There was no incision enlargement, no vitrectomy, and no sutures done.Patient outcome unknown.No other information was provided.This report captures the issues reported with the left eye (os) of the patient.A separate report was already filed for the right eye (od) of the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a3b, a4, a5 and a6: unknown/ not provided.Device evaluation: the product testing could not be performed as the product was not returned for evaluation.The reported complaint cannot be confirmed.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specifications.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no other complaints were received for this po.Conclusion: based on the investigation, no malfunction or product deficiency was identified.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: may 22, 2024.Section h3.Device evaluated manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection of the complaint lens reveal that it was received cut in half and with one half was missing.The lens displayed no issues that would have caused or contributed to the complaint event.The complaint issue "glare-transient", "sub-optimal results", and "pco: posterior capsule opacification" were not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|