|
The device was not returned for evaluation.Lot history record (lhr) and corrective and preventive actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot specific issue.There were no leaks noted during preparation, which suggests a product quality issue did not contribute to the reported difficulties.In this case, the lesion site was described as moderately calcified.It is likely that balloon material was damaged due to interaction with calcified lesion resulting in material rupture during inflation.Based on the reported information, there is no indication that the reported material rupture was related to a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|