• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. MAXCORE; BIOPSY INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. MAXCORE; BIOPSY INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number MC1416
Medical Device Problem Code Failure to Fire (2610)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Hematoma (1884); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/23/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 04/2026).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a echographic guided renal biopsy procedure via the tangential oblique approach, the patient allegedly developed with intra and peri-renal hematoma.It was further reported that patient was hospitalized for intra and peri-renal hematoma.Furthermore, the cannula of the device had allegedly malfunctioned.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an ultrasound-guided renal biopsy procedure through normal density tissue via the tangential oblique approach, the needle allegedly did not close to take the sample.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced a kidney wound with an intra and peri-renal haematoma which required hospitalisation for management.Reportedly, the hematoma was treated with ice pressure.A coaxial was used and the procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional information was received, and the file was reassessed for reportability and determined to be reportable as malfunction.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 04/2026).H11: h6 (patient).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an ultrasound-guided renal biopsy procedure through normal density tissue via the tangential oblique approach, the needle allegedly did not close to take the sample.It was further reported that the patient allegedly experienced a kidney wound with an intra and peri-renal haematoma which required hospitalisation for management.Reportedly, the hematoma was treated with ice pressure.A coaxial was used and the procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one maxcore device received for evaluation.Upon visual evaluation, the device appeared to have blood residue throughout the cannula and received without protective tubing and no yellow guard attached to the needle.The device was received both slides in initial position.On functional testing, the device was able to be fully primed with no issues.The device was further tested by cocking and firing the device 3 times in a chicken breast with each trigger, for a total of 6 tests.The device was able to prime and fire properly.All 6 samples were obtained with no issues.Therefore, the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported failure to fire as the device was able to prime and fire properly and all 6 samples were obtained with no issues.A definitive root cause for the alleged failure to fire could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 04/2026), g3.H11: h6 (method, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAXCORE
Common Device Name
BIOPSY INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key19369422
Report Number2020394-2024-00665
Device Sequence Number20710394
Product Code KNW
UDI-Device Identifier00801741084430
UDI-Public(01)00801741084430
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryTS
PMA/510(K) Number
K133948
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Pharmacist
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/13/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberMC1416
Device Lot NumberREHS4676
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/24/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/21/2024
07/02/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/22/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/07/2024
07/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/04/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-