|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
1706061 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Flush (1251); Suction Problem (2170); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Insufficient Information (4580); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
08/02/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Death
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the port was allegedly non-functional.It was further reported that the port was removed, and new port has been placed.Reportedly, the patient was expired, and the cause of death was not provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: date of death for this patient was not provided, date of death updated as 01-jan-1900 for the mdr submission requirement.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 08/2020).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: date of death for this patient was not provided, date of death updated as (b)(6) 1900 for the mdr submission requirement.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.However, a medical record was provided for review.Based on this medical record, the difficult to flush, suction problem and catheter migration can be confirmed.However, the medical records did not contain information on the patient death, and no death certificate was provided.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported patient death.The definitive root cause for the difficult to flush, suction problem and catheter migration could not be determined based upon the available information.The relationship between the device and reported patient death is unknown.The medical records do not contain definitive reasoning that the alleged patient death was related to the device.Therefore, based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for the event is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: h6 (device, method).H11: d4 (unique identifier (udi) #), h6 (patient, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that four days post a port placement, the port was allegedly non-functional.It was further reported that the port had allegedly migrated.Reportedly, the port was removed and replaced.Evidently, the patient was expired, and primary cause of death was not provided, and the relationship of death with the device was not provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|