• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INGENIO; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INGENIO; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number K172
Medical Device Problem Codes Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Over-Sensing (1438); Off-Label Use (1494)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/30/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this pacemaker recorded noise over sensing during a non-conditional magnetic resonance imaging (mri) procedure.Ventricular pacing marched through the observed noise at the mri procedure.The pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.The returned device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory.Visual examination of the device header and case noted no anomalies.Dimensional analysis of the header was completed.Each port measured as expected.The device was then exposed to simulated heart load conditions, and the pacing and sensing functions were tested.Impedance testing was completed and all measurements were within normal limits.The device operated appropriately with no interruptions in therapy output at the returned programmed settings.A series of electrical tests was also performed, and again, normal device function was observed.Analysis did not identify any device characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this pacemaker recorded noise over sensing during a non-conditional magnetic resonance imaging (mri) procedure.Ventricular pacing marched through the observed noise at the mri procedure.The pacemaker has been explanted due to normal battery depletion (nbd) and returned for analysis without additional allegations.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INGENIO
Common Device Name
IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key19388751
Report Number2124215-2024-31694
Device Sequence Number18078735
Product Code LWP
UDI-Device Identifier00802526516818
UDI-Public00802526516818
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCT
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
N970003/S132
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2014
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Nurse Practitioner
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/26/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date03/13/2016
Device Model NumberK172
Device Catalogue NumberK172
Device Lot Number120138
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/03/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/23/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/23/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/26/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/24/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-