| Model Number |
ONYXNG20026UX |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Entrapment of Device (1212); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Positioning Problem (3009)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
05/17/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: it was later stated that it is believed that that the reason for stent dislodgment was likely due to the stent catching on a previous stent.Resistance was noted during withdrawal of the device and force was noted.The stent that was deployed in order to crush the dislodged stent was a medtronic stent and there were no issues noted with it when crushing the dislodged stent.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: it was believed that there was not a defect with the stent itself and it simply got caught on the previous stent and/or tavr valve.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
An attempt was made to use one onyx frontier coronary drug eluting stent to treat a moderately tortuous, moderately calcified lesion in the mid left main (lm) coronary artery.The patient had tortuous vessels.The device was inspected with no issues.Negative prep was not performed.The lesion was pre-dilated.The device did not device pass through a previously deployed stent.Resistance was encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was not used during delivery.It was reported that stent dislodgement occurred during removal following failed delivery. the dislodged stent was not removed.After review of the procedural films, it seems likely that the stent caught on the previously implanted medtronic tavr valve, or on the previously implanted proximal lad stent when the delivery system was attempted to pass through previous stent.The stent would not cross, was pulled back and dislodged in the lm. the stent was crushed in the lm with an additional stent.The patient is alive with no further injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|