|
SHOCKWAVE MEDICAL, INC. SHOCKWAVE C2+ CORONARY INTRAVASCULAR LITHOTRIPSY (IVL) CATHETER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
C2PIVL4012 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Atrial Fibrillation (1729); Hematoma (1884); Vascular Dissection (3160); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
| Date of Event |
03/18/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device referenced in this report was not returned to shockwave medical, inc.Therefore, a physical examination cannot be performed.The cause of the dissection, pericardial effusion, atrial fibrillation, and hematoma could not be determined based on the information available.There was no report of any device malfunction.Shockwave medical has controls in place to ensure devices are built to approved procedures and meet lot release acceptance criteria prior to being distributed.A review of the manufacturing and test documentation for subject lot does not reveal any issues with the manufacturing of the device.The device passed all of shockwave medical, inc.Acceptance criteria prior to shipping.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Two shockwave c2+ coronary intravascular lithotripsy catheters were successfully used to treat lesions in the coronary arteries.This report is for the first catheter reported (refer to mdr 3015053858-2024-00052 for the second catheter).The first c2+ catheter was used to treat a lesion in the right coronary artery (rca) and successfully delivered 60 pulses.The second c2+ catheter was used to treat a lesion in the left anterior descending artery (lad) and successfully delivered 20 pulses.There were no device malfunctions reported for either catheter.After the procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2024, the patient was found to have type a aortic dissection after complaints of chest pain.The patient was then treated with iv esmolol and tight blood pressure control.The patient was admitted to continue observation.0n (b)(6) 2024, a few weeks after the initial procedure was performed, the patient presented to the emergency department (ed) with chest pain.The patient converted into atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (rvr).The patient was then placed on ditiazem and converted back to normal sinus rhythm.Additionally, on that same day, a computed tomography angiography (cta) scan was completed and a moderate to large pericardial effusion was noted.The patient was transferred and admitted.Pericardiocentesis with drain placement was performed.The patient felt much improved and was discharged on (b)(6) 2024.On (b)(6) 2024, the patient presented again to the emergency department (ed) with chest pain.The patient converted into atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (rvr).The patient was then placed on ditiazem and converted back into normal sinus rhythm.On that same day, a cta scan and transthoracic echocardiogram (tte) scan were completed.Moderate to large pericardial effusion and hematoma were noted.The patient was then transferred and admitted.Pericardial window procedure was performed, and the patient was given medication.The patient felt improvement and was discharged on (b)(6) 2024.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|