• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD FEMORAL HEAD 44MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD FEMORAL HEAD 44MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 74123144
Medical Device Problem Code Biocompatibility (2886)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Arthralgia (2355); Metal Related Pathology (4530); High metal ion levels (4847)
Date of Event 06/13/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient underwent a right hip revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022 due to mechanical complication of internal prosthesis and metallosis.During the revision, the metallic cup was noticed to be well fixed, and it was retained.The metallic femoral head was explanted and replaced.The new system implanted was a tha with dual mobility liner.Primary right hip bhr procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2009.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that the patient underwent a right hip revision surgery due to mechanical complication of internal prosthesis and metallosis.During the revision, the metallic cup was noticed to be well fixed, and it was retained.The metallic femoral head was explanted and replaced.The new system implanted was a total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility liner.No further information is available.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the alleged devices was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.No other similar complaints have been identified for cup and head, and this failure will continue to be monitored via routine trending, however it should be noted that this device is no longer sold.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions are required.The available medical documents were reviewed.It should be noted the surgical technique indicates the acetabular component is to be impacted with 15-20° of anteversion.The implantation operative report indicated the acetabular component was implanted at about 20 to 25 degrees of anteversion.With the information provided a clinical root cause of the reported pain and elevated metal ions cannot be confirmed.The patient impact is the revision and postoperative convalescence period.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: g2, h6 (health effect - clinical code).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10.Additional information in b4.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FEMORAL HEAD 44MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key19402110
Report Number3005975929-2024-00072
Device Sequence Number8393626
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010552419
UDI-Public3596010552419
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P040033
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2009
Device Explanted Year2022
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/30/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/29/2013
Device Catalogue Number74123144
Device Lot Number08DW16604
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/30/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/12/2024
Not provided
09/20/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/27/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/13/2024
07/17/2024
09/30/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/30/2008
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
Z-2745-2015
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age58 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-