• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 TITANIUM LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT, BROVIAC SINGLE-LUMEN, 6.6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 TITANIUM LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT, BROVIAC SINGLE-LUMEN, 6.6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0606100
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562); Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 04/30/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo and an image were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 04/2025) h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that sometime post a port placement, the catheter allegedly took an odd direction at the level of the clavicle and attempts at straightening it were unsuccessful, but the catheter functioned well without any difficulty.It was further reported that two years, two months and twenty-six days post the port placement, in the process of removing the port, the connector that holds the catheter onto the port body was allegedly found to be fractured lengthwise in half and was not intact.Furthermore, the pieces were separate from each other but held within a fibrous capsule, and a small broken piece had moved slightly.Reportedly, the capsule was grossly dissected, and the pieces were removed with forceps.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that sometime post a port placement, the catheter allegedly took an odd direction at the level of the clavicle and attempts at straightening it were unsuccessful, but the catheter functioned well without any difficulty.It was further reported that two years, two months and twenty-six days post the port placement, in the process of removing the port, the connector that holds the catheter onto the port body was allegedly found to be fractured lengthwise in half and was not intact.Furthermore, the pieces were separate from each other but held within a fibrous capsule, and a small broken piece had moved slightly.Reportedly, the capsule was grossly dissected, and the pieces were removed with forceps.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one bardport titanium l/p implantable port, one catheter segment, and one cath-lock in two segments were received for evaluation.One electronic photo and image were provided for review.Gross, visual, microscopic, tactile and functional testing were performed on the returned device.One cathlock into two segments was noted.Tool damage was noted to both segments of the cath-lock.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported cathlock fracture and material separation.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported migration issue as the exact circumstances at the time of reported event is unknown.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 04/2025), g3, h6 (method) h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TITANIUM LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT, BROVIAC SINGLE-LUMEN, 6.6F
Common Device Name
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key19413539
Report Number3006260740-2024-02642
Device Sequence Number15640101
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741026041
UDI-Public(01)00801741026041
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K050310
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2024
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/25/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number0606100
Device Lot NumberREEY3357
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/22/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/02/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/25/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/29/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age13 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight49 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-