• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO BCT SPECTA OPTIA; SPECTRA OPTIA IDL SET

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO BCT SPECTA OPTIA; SPECTRA OPTIA IDL SET Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 10310
Medical Device Problem Codes No Apparent Adverse Event (3189); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 10/07/2019
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Lot number, manufacture and expiry date are not available at this time.Investigation is in process, a follow-up report will be provided.Citation: oarbeascoa, g., lozano, m.L., guerra, l.M., amunarriz, c., saavedra, c.A., garcia-gala, j.M., viejo, a., revilla, n., fleitas, c.A., arroyo, j.L., revuelta, e.M., galego, a., hernandez-maraver, d., kwon, m., diez-martin, j.L., & pascual, c.(2020).Retrospective multicenter study of extracorporeal photopheresis in steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. biology of blood and marrow transplantation, 26(4), 651¿658. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Bbmt.2019.12.769.
 
Event or Problem Description
Per journal article "retrospective multicenter study of extracorporeal photopheresis in steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease" by gillen oarbeascoa, maria luisa lozano, luisa maria guerra, cristina amunarriz, concepcion andon saavedra, jose maria garcia-gala, aurora viejo, nuria revilla, cynthia acosta fleitas, jose luis arroyo, eva martinez revuelta, andrea galego, dolores hernandez-maraver, mi kwon, jose luis diez-martin, cristina pascual extracorporeal photopheresis (ecp) is an established treatment strategy in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (gvhd).This study¿s main objective was to analyze the clinical response and impact of ecp therapy in steroid dose reduction.A retrospective observational series of 113 patients from 7 transplantation centers was analyzed.Sixty-five patients (58%) had acute gvhd (agvhd), and 48 (42%) had chronic gvhd (cgvhd).All ecp procedures were performed with the off-line system.The median number of procedures until achievement of initial response was 3 for both patients with agvhd and those with cgvhd.Ecp was the second-line therapy in 48% of the agvhd cases and in 50% of the cgvhd cases.71% of the cases of agvhd were grade iii-iv, and 69% of the cases of cgvhd were severe.The overall response rate on day 28 was 53% (complete response [cr] rate, 45%) in the patients with agvhd and 67% (cr, 23%) in those with cgvhd.Skin was the most frequently involved organ, with a response rate of 58% (cr, 49%) in the patients with agvhd and 69% (cr 29%) in those with cgvhd.At the end of ecp treatment, 60% of patients treated for agvhd who responded were able to stop steroid therapy, with a median dose reduction of 100%.Significant differences in overall survival were observed for patients responding to ecp with agvhd (hazard ratio [hr], 4.3; p <.001) and with cgvhd (hr, 4.8; p =.003).Our data indicate that ecp is a valid therapeutic alternative in patients with steroid-refractory agvhd and cgvhd, permitting significant steroid dosage reductions.Specific details, such as patient information and outcome, were not included in the article for these events, therefore this report is being provided as a summary of the events.It is unknown at this time if medical intervention was required for these events the collection set is not available for return because it was discarded by the customer.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being filed to provide additional information in h.6 and h.11.Investigation: further evaluation of this event has determined that the device did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, nor is there a likely potential for death or serious injury associated with this event based on additional investigational information.It was confirmed that the the deaths are not related to the device/disposable or procedure.Lot number, manufacture and expiry date are not available at this time.No further reporting will be provided as this does not represent a reportable event.Citation: oarbeascoa, g., lozano, m.L., guerra, l.M., amunarriz, c., saavedra, c.A., garcia-gala, j.M., viejo, a., revilla, n., fleitas, c.A., arroyo, j.L., revuelta, e.M., galego, a., hernandez-maraver, d., kwon, m., diez-martin, j.L., & pascual, c.(2020).Retrospective multicenter study of extracorporeal photopheresis in steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation, 26(4), 651¿658.Https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Bbmt.2019.12.769.
 
Event or Problem Description
Per journal article "retrospective multicenter study of extracorporeal photopheresis in steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease" by gillen oarbeascoa, maria luisa lozano, luisa maria guerra, cristina amunarriz, concepcion andon saavedra, jose maria garcia-gala, aurora viejo, nuria revilla, cynthia acosta fleitas, jose luis arroyo, eva martinez revuelta, andrea galego, dolores hernandez-maraver, mi kwon, jose luis diez-martin, cristina pascual extracorporeal photopheresis (ecp) is an established treatment strategy in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (gvhd).This study¿s main objective was to analyze the clinical response and impact of ecp therapy in steroid dose reduction.A retrospective observational series of 113 patients from 7 transplantation centers was analyzed.Sixty-five patients (58%) had acute gvhd (agvhd), and 48 (42%) had chronic gvhd (cgvhd).All ecp procedures were performed with the off-line system.The median number of procedures until achievement of initial response was 3 for both patients with agvhd and those with cgvhd.Ecp was the second-line therapy in 48% of the agvhd cases and in 50% of the cgvhd cases.71% of the cases of agvhd were grade iii-iv, and 69% of the cases of cgvhd were severe.The overall response rate on day 28 was 53% (complete response [cr] rate, 45%) in the patients with agvhd and 67% (cr, 23%) in those with cgvhd.Skin was the most frequently involved organ, with a response rate of 58% (cr, 49%) in the patients with agvhd and 69% (cr 29%) in those with cgvhd.At the end of ecp treatment, 60% of patients treated for agvhd who responded were able to stop steroid therapy, with a median dose reduction of 100%.Significant differences in overall survival were observed for patients responding to ecp with agvhd (hazard ratio [hr], 4.3; p <.001) and with cgvhd (hr, 4.8; p =.003).Our data indicate that ecp is a valid therapeutic alternative in patients with steroid-refractory agvhd and cgvhd, permitting significant steroid dosage reductions.Specific details, such as patient information and outcome, were not included in the article for these events, therefore this report is being provided as a summary of the events.It is unknown at this time if medical intervention was required for these events.The collection set is not available for return because it was discarded by the customer.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPECTA OPTIA
Common Device Name
SPECTRA OPTIA IDL SET
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO BCT
lakewood CO 80215
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO BCT
10810 w. collins ave
lakewood CO 80215
Manufacturer Contact
scot hilden
10810 w. collins ave
lakewood, CO 80215
MDR Report Key19425619
Report Number1722028-2024-00199
Device Sequence Number7905716
Product Code LKN
UDI-Device Identifier05020583103108
UDI-Public05020583103108
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySP
PMA/510(K) Number
K183081
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Literature
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/30/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number10310
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/06/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/16/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/30/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/17/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-