|
It was reported that during a tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, the procise max coblator wand was being used to remove the adenoid tissue and at some point, a right oral commissure thermal injury was not noticed (second-degree burn).No metal to metal contact was made during the event and the wand was activated for 10 to 15 minutes.The procedure was completed with the same device with no surgical delay.The lip was treated with cool compress and bacitracin ointment.The patient's lip is reported to be swelling and painful.
|
|
H10: h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.The root cause of the reported event could not be determined due to the limited clinical information provided.Visual inspection observed the irrigation delivery system and power connection has been cut from the device.Electrodes have been used.Debris is on and around the electrode.The wand is bent.The wand was not returned with any original packaging.A functional evaluation could not be performed due to the power connection and irrigation system being cut from the device.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states that according to the report, the findings of the right oral commissure thermal injury were not reported until the end of the surgery.It is unclear exactly when this adverse occurred.One undated, unlabeled photo was provided that confirms the presence of a 2nd degree right oral commissure thermal injury.The attached photo shows a red circle around the wand that confirm the wand was bent.The ifu does warn, ¿use care when bending the want shaft.Aggressive bending could occlude internal suction/saline lines and/or damage the wand shaft insulation that could lead to unwanted electrical conduction resulting in patient burns.Due to the smaller anatomies of certain patients, carefully monitor the surrounding tissues to ensure tissue ablation is localized to the targeted tissue.¿ based on the information provided, this adverse event was likely procedural related, and the device had no influence on the adverse event.The patient impact beyond the 2nd degree burn, bacitracin ointment, and the cool compresses could not be determined since the patient¿s outcome was not reported.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include aggressive bending of the wand.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|