| Catalog Number |
M0035431020 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/22/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during middle carotid artery (mca) aneurysm embolization procedure, the operator used the subject coil to deliver into the microcatheter.The operator checked the device and flushed it before delivery, however, big resistance was encountered during the delivery and the subject coil could not be pushed out of the microcatheter.When the operator withdrew the coil, he found that it was fractured from the delivery wire.The procedure was completed successfully.No clinical consequences were reported to the patient due to this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during middle carotid artery (mca) aneurysm embolization procedure, the operator used the subject coil to deliver into the microcatheter.The operator checked the device and flushed it before delivery, however, big resistance was encountered during the delivery and the subject coil could not be pushed out of the microcatheter.When the operator withdrew the coil, he found that it was fractured from the delivery wire.The procedure was completed successfully.No clinical consequences were reported to the patient due to this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3 device evaluated by mfg ¿updated.D9 product available to stryker ¿ updated.D9 returned to manufacturer on ¿updated.Due to the automated manufacturing execution system (mes) system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.During visual inspection the device was returned with unknown guidewire.The main coil was returned within the microcatheter¿s hub.The main coil delivery wire was not returned.The main coil was seen to be kinked/bent.The main coil was seen to be prematurely detached/separated during use.Functional inspection to test the reported event ¿coil in catheter friction¿ was not performed as the returned device detached from the delivery wire.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported event ¿main coil broken fractured during use¿ was not confirmed during analysis.The reported event ¿coil in catheter friction¿ could not be replicated during device analysis; however, the analysis results are consistent with the reported event.The device failed to meet specifications when received for complaint investigation based on the analyzed anomalies noted to the device.Additional information provided by the customer is, the device prepared for use as per dfu.There was no damage noted to the packaging prior to opening the packaging.The device confirmed to be in good condition during preparation/prior to use on the patient.Continuous flush was set up and maintained throughout the clinical procedure.The patient¿s anatomy was moderately tortuous.The main coil got stuck within the microcatheter and when the customer withdrew it fractured from the delivery wire.During analysis, the device was returned with an unknown guidewire.The main coil was returned within the hub of the microcatheter.The main coil delivery wire was not returned.The main coil was removed for analysis and was found to be kinked and prematurely detached.An assignable cause of not confirmed will be assigned to the reported event ¿main coil broken/fractured during use¿ as the defect was not confirmed during analysis.An assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to the reported event ¿coil in catheter friction¿ as this defect appears to be associated with a product that met stryker design and manufacturing specifications and was used in accordance with the dfu, but performance was limited due to procedural factors during use.An assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to the analyzed events ¿main coil kinked/bent¿ and ¿main coil prematurely detached/separated during use¿ these defects appears to be associated with a product that met stryker design and manufacturing specifications and was used in accordance with the dfu, but performance was limited due to procedural factors during use.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|