|
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL GS 90, 95 CM, STRAIGHT, DISTAL; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, NEUROVASCULATURE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
GS9095SD |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Crack (1135)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/01/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, sex, gender, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Section e.1: the name, phone and email address of the initial reporter are not available / reported.Section h.3: the device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (31045395) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The healthcare professional reported that there was a crack noted on the 95cm cerebase da guide sheath (gs9095sd / 31045395) upon opening the package.The issue was noted pre-op; there was no patient involvement.On 29-may-2024, additional information was received.Per the information, the crack was observed at the proximal end, distal to the hub.Nothing unusual was noted on the device packaging.The device was replaced with another 95cm cerebase da guide sheath (gs9095sd).The reported issue did not result in any delay in the procedure.The information also indicated that the device packaging is available for return.On 31-may-2024, additional information was received.Per the information, the reported device damage was noticed before removing the device from the package.The device was not removed from the packaging.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report that the product analysis lab received the complaint device on 17-jun-2024.A supplemental 3500a report will be submitted once the product investigation has been completed.Updated sections.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report the investigational finding of the returned device.The complaint product was returned and received for evaluation and analysis.The investigation is documented below.Investigation summary: a non-sterile 95cm cerebase da guide sheath was received contained in the decontamination pouch.Visual inspection was performed.The device was observed to be fractured at 3cm from the id band.No other damages were observed.The fracture was inspected under the microscope and it was observed that the internal braid wire was exposed.Elongation marks were noted on both edges.The other joints in the distal region of the catheter were intact, without obvious separations.The fracture surfaces of the vestamid shaft show stretching and tearing of the shaft material at the edges of the fracture, indicating material elongation and tearing.The inner diameter (id) and outer diameter (od) of the catheter were confirmed to be within specifications.The reported issue regarding a catheter being fractured was confirmed based on the fractured condition found on the catheter.The catheter was received with a fracture of the vestamid shaft at approximately 3cm distal to the id band.This is a known failure mode of the catheter and can occur on a properly fused catheter.The observed condition could be the result of several factors, including but not limited to procedural factors present in the operating room such as operator¿s technique.According to the risk documentation, a catheter being damaged is a potential issue that can occur due to an inappropriate handling catheter during the device removal from the package.The instructions for use (ifu) includes precaution to inspect the guide sheath upon removal from packaging to verify that it is undamaged.A conclusive cause cannot be determined since the device was returned without the original package.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device (b)(4) number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.As part of cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Devices undergo 100% inspection at different points during the manufacturing process to prevent damages from leaving the facility.It should be noted that product failure could be caused by multiple factors.The instructions for use (ifu) contains the following caution: carefully inspect all devices prior to use.Verify size, length, and condition are suitable for the specific procedure.Do not use a cerebase da guide sheath, dilator, or hemostasis valve that has been damaged in any way; replace with another guide sheath, dilator, or hemostasis valve.A damaged device may cause complications.Exercise care in handling the cerebase da guide sheath to reduce the chance of accidental damage.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.Updated sections: b.4, d.4, g.3, g.6.H.2, h.3, h.6, and h.11.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|