• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG GAV 2.0 VALVE 10/25; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG GAV 2.0 VALVE 10/25; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX214T
Medical Device Problem Code Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 05/03/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: during the investigation, no significant deformation or damage of the valve, but some visible deposits in the reservoir could be determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valve does not operate within the accepted tolerance in either position.An accelerated outflow of gav 2.0 could be determined.Internal inspection : after dismantling of the valve, visible deposits were found in gav 2.0.Results: based on our investigation results, we can determine an accelerated outflow in the valve.The determined deposits can be named as the cause for the accelerated outflow.Organic material in the cerebrospinal fluid can influence the function temporarily and are known side effects in hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a gav 2.0 (#fx214t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2024.According to the complainant, the valve caused an underdrainage.The patient underwent a revision procedure.The complainant device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 4 years weight: 19 kg gender: female.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GAV 2.0 VALVE 10/25
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key19499362
Report Number3004721439-2024-00150
Device Sequence Number7972502
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906500047
UDI-Public4041906500047
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUK
PMA/510(K) Number
K190174
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/10/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberFX214T
Device Catalogue NumberFX214T
Device Lot Number20074088
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/23/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/13/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/10/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/07/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age4 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight19 KG
-
-