• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 17 BEADS; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. 1.5T LINX, 17 BEADS; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LXMC17
Medical Device Problem Code Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815)
Date of Event 01/01/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 10/3/2024.Corrected data: d1, d4.Additional information received: the customer sent back a lxmc17.The customer said it should have been reported as a lxmc17.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 6/25/2024.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? when using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? did the patient have any pre-existing dysphagia or other conditions (other than gerd)? how severe was the dysphagia/odynophagia before intervention? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported dysphagia? besides the reported dysphagia, what was the reason for removal of the linx device? was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal? answer: no further information from the customer at this time.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 6/10/2024.B3: only event year known: 2024.D6a: exact date is unknown.Assumed first day of the month and first month of the year.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.The manufacturing records were reviewed and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this lot.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the linx was explanted due to dysphagia.The patient's implant was done in 2019 and had no issues for 5 years.Linx was explanted on (b)(6) 2024.Patient is recovering well with no further issues.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 11/6/2024.Corrected data: d4 lot number, d4 expiration date, h4 manufacture date.H11: the manufacturing records were reviewed and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this lot.A lot number was not provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 11/8/2024.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: it was reported that the lot number for this event was 24768.However, the lot number of 24768 is for a lxmc14.When the device was returned a lxmc17 was received and upon asking for additional information it was stated that a lxmc17 was the product code for this event.Was the lot number of 24768 reported incorrectly? what was the lot number for this event? requested added info from the customer.No additional information is available at this time.Thxs.The device upon which this medwatch is based has been received, however, the evaluation is not yet complete.Any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 11/12/2024 investigation summary overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, significant tooling marks were noted in some beads.Link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
1.5T LINX, 17 BEADS
Common Device Name
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4545 creek road
cincinnati OH
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
4545 creek rd.
cincinnati, OH 45242
3035526892
MDR Report Key19499859
Report Number3008766073-2024-00092
Device Sequence Number7907557
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005370
UDI-Public00855106005370
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P100049
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/18/2023
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC17
Device Lot Number24768
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/21/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/12/2024
09/25/2024
10/28/2024
10/28/2024
11/08/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/10/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/25/2024
10/03/2024
11/06/2024
11/08/2024
11/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/18/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
Yes
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-