|
|
| Model Number |
DIU150 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse (1254); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Corneal Edema (1791)
|
| Date of Event |
05/14/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section: a3b, a5: unknown/ asked but not available.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that upon injecting the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) into the patient's left eye it was noticed that the haptic had not folded and was caught in the plunger as the lens was stuck in the cartridge, and essentially tore from the optic.The issue was noticed when it had unfolded in the patient's eye.The lens was removed and replaced with a same model lens in the same procedure.There was no patient injury.There was no medical/surgical intervention required.From additional information it was learnt that there was no use error.The patient is fine, but there was a little bit of edema noticed during post-op visit.There was no any medical/surgical intervention required to resolve the edema.No other information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 06/06/2024.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection of the complaint device reveals that it was received with the plunger rod advanced.A haptic could be observed to be stuck in the cartridge and overridden.Viscoelastic residue was distributed through the length of the cartridge.The lens module was inspected and presented with no damage or viscoelastic residue.The device assembly was inspected and presented with no issues.The plunger rod was advanced and no issues were identified.The lens was received cut in half.The lens was torn a the haptic/optic junction and the removed piece included the haptic.Conclusion: the complaint issue trailing haptic not folded was not identified during product evaluation.The other complaint issue iol torn was identified during product evaluation.Based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|