|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 01/2024) h11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.The patient underwent bard hickman central venous catheter implantation.Sometime later post catheter placement, patient developed bacteremia and the catheter was removed.Around two months later, patient underwent right internal jugular vein double lumen port placement procedure for leukocytosis.Patient with the history of lupus, mast cell activation, chronic venous access dependence with bacteremia associated with hickman catheter that was removed.Cleared bacteremia and recommended port for long term access.A 15 blade was used to incise the skin.Blunt and sharp dissection were used to create a subcutaneous pocket.The catheter was advanced through the peel away and positioned centrally using fluoroscopy.The peel away sheath was removed, and hemostasis was achieved with manual compression.The catheter was cut to length to reach mid right atrium.The port was slid into the subcutaneous pocket.Final fluoroscopy showed the port and catheter to be in good position without kink and terminated at the cavoatrial junction.The lumens of the port were then accessed with needles for immediate use and reservoirs were instilled with concentrated heparin in the interim.Around six months later, blood culture report showed methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection.Five days later, patient underwent port removal procedure for concern for port infection with bacteremia.Local anesthetic was infused into the right upper chest.An incision was at an optimal location for port removal.Blunt and sharp dissection was used to free the port from the pocket.The port-a-cath and associated catheter were removed intact.The port cavity was inspected and found to be free of debris or blood.Patient tolerated the procedure well and no immediate complications.Per the medical record review, it was confirmed the patient had bacteremia.However, the relationship between the port and the alleged adverse event is unknown, and there was no device malfunction that was reported or occurred.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiry date: 01/2024), g3, h6 (method).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|