|
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH X3 TRIATHLON INSERT CS NUM7 10MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
5531-G-710-E |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Mechanical Problem (1384)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Scar Tissue (2060)
|
| Date of Event |
05/20/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Reported event: an event regarding range of motion (rom) involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.Product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it as reported that the patient was reported due to stiffness in the joint.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as return of the device, pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient's right knee was revised due to stiffness in the joint.The 10mm insert was removed, scar tissue excised and posterior capsule released.A new 10mm insert was then implanted.The use of mako in the primary surgery was not thought to have contributed to this complication.No further information available from the doctor or hospital.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|