|
The customer has not indicated if the complaint sample will be returned to viant for evaluation and has not yet been received to date.Once the complaint sample is received, it will be investigated and a follow-up medwatch 3500a emdr will be submitted.Complaint information provided by distributor, depuy synthes.
|
|
H3: the complaint sample was not returned to viant for evaluation.Thus, the reported event is non-verifiable.The current ifu sent with this device today, man-004006 rev.A, states the following.End of life is determined by wear and damage due to intended use, · visually inspect for damage and wear.If the instrument is damaged and worn it is considered at the end of its life and should be discarded, where instruments form part of a larger assembly, check assembly with mating components, check hinged instruments for smooth movement, each component of the viant offset reamer handle is not a medical device, all components when assembled create the medical device.Therefore, the components of each viant reamer handle form a unique set when assembled.In no instance should the components from one offset reamer handle be mixed with components from another reamer handle.The unique device identification for this medical device is located on the assembled offset reamer handle, viant devices should only be used by qualified personnel fully trained in the use of the surgical instruments and the relevant surgical procedures, do not modify viant instruments in any way and handle with care at all times.Surface scratches can increase wear and the risk of corrosion, manual surgical instruments have a limited life-span which is determined by wear or damage due to repeated intended use.When a surgical instrument reaches the end of its functional life, clean the instrument of any and all biomaterial/biohazards and safely discard the instrument in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.The device history records (dhr) were reviewed and found no related manufacturing deviations or anomalies that would have contributed to the reported event.The device had experienced approximately 3.09 years of use.It is unknown how many surgical procedures (cycles) this device had experienced throughout its life in the field.The viant risk management files were reviewed to ensure the reported failure mode (or similar) is captured.The review revealed there are similar failure modes identified and mitigated to the lowest possible level.In conclusion, the complaint sample was not received by viant for evaluation and so the reported event is non-verifiable.If the complaint sample is received by viant, it will be evaluated and the complaint record will be updated accordingly.No further investigation with regard to this complaint is required at this time.Viant will continue to monitor for trends.H6: updated type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions based on evaluation.
|