|
A visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported stretched stent was not confirmed.The reported difficult to advance and difficult to remove could not be tested due to the condition of the returned device.Production record and corrective and preventive actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a review of the complaint handling database identified no other complaints.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported difficult to advance/position and difficult to remove.As the reported stretched stent could not be confirmed during returned device analysis testing, it is likely the account was referring to the observed material deformation (bent, overlapping, and stretched struts).Factors which may contribute to difficulty advancing and removing the device in the introducer sheath include, but are not limited to, damage to the stent, damage to the introducer sheath / guiding catheter, sheath/guiding catheter size selection or procedural technique (devices not properly supported or coaxially aligned).In this case, it may be possible that the inner diameter of the introducer sheath was smaller than the recommended diameter of 0.085 inches (2.15 mm) indicated on the omnilink elite product label.It should be noted that there is no specific industry definition of 6f introducer sheath / guide catheter dimensions or what it means to have a product that is 6f compatible.The only guidance the sheath producers have is to make the inner diameter larger than 2.00mm and smaller than 2.33mm.This contrasts with the convention for guiding catheters that have a clear definition of a maximum outer diameter of 2.0mm.The lack of clear industry guidance may be a contributing factor to why there is a broad range of inner diameters found in commercial introducer sheaths.In addition, it is likely the device interacted with the introducer sheath during advancement, as resistance was noted, causing the observed bunched and smashed inner/outer member.Further interaction with the introducer sheath during retraction of the device, as resistance was again noted, likely contributed to the observed material deformation, ultimately causing the observed stent dislodgement.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.Additional information: d4 - model # added.Corrections: d1 - brand name updated.D2a - common device name updated.D3 - name updated.D3 - address, city, postal code updated.
|