|
It was reported that, after a left tha on (b)(6) 2020, patient sustained a periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left hip joint that required revision surgery on (b)(6) 2020 in which the stem fem synergy sz 16, insert acetabular or3o xlpe od 46 mm id28 mm 2 mobility and head fem taper 28mm + 0 were explanted and exchanged for smith & nephew back-up devices.Current patient's health status is unknown.No other complications were reported.
|
|
Internal reference number: (b)(4).H10: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication identified through the review of clinical evidence from post market clinical data collection activities that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product.The reported issue(s) relate to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
|
Additional information: h6 (type of investigation), h10 (roi).H3, h6: although the involvement of all the devices was reported, the relationship with the investigated failure was directly associated to the stem and acetabular shell.Given the nature of the alleged incident, the devices could not be returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The devices' batch numbers were not provided, thus, an evaluation of the manufacturing records could not be performed.A review of complaint history for the previous 12 months did not reveal similar events for the listed devices.A review of the instructions for use documents for total hip systems revealed in the warnings and precautions section that failure to use the optimum-sized component may result in loosening, bending, cracking, or fracture of the component and/or bone, resulting in revision surgery.Besides, congenital deformity, improper implant selection, improper broaching or reaming, osteoporosis, bone defects due to misdirected reaming, trauma, strenuous activity, improper implant alignment or placement, patient non-compliance, etc.Can increase the risk of femoral or pelvic fractures.A review of the risk management files revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this products and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the products failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include patient bone quality, post-operative patient condition and/or surgical technique.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|