• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU225
Medical Device Problem Code Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section a-4 patient weight: unknown/asked information unavailable.Section a-5 patient ethnicity: unknown/asked information unavailable.Section a-6 patient race: unknown/asked information unavailable.Section b-3: date of event: unknown as information was not provided.The best estimation date is between (b)(6) 2024 and (b)(6) 2024 (iol implant and explant dates).Section h-3 device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch report will be filed.Attempts were made to contact the customer account requesting additional information regarding complaint however, to date no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported the diu225 model intraocular lens (iol) was implanted into the patient¿s ocular sinister (left eye).In a secondary surgical procedure, the iol was explanted due to complaints of lens malposition.The explanted iol was replaced with the same model lens but with a different diopter, diu225 13.0 diopter iol.There was no patient injury and no medical or surgical intervention.Patient status post-lens exchange was reported as fine.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d-9: device date returned to manufacturer: 18-jun-2024.Section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: half of a lens was received in a gauze.The lens was received under magnification.The lens half was cleaned and presented with no issues that would have caused or contributed to the complaint event.Complaint issue "instability of device after implantation" was not identified during product evaluation.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications and the complaint issue reported could not be confirmed.No product deficiency or product malfunction was identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key19564151
Report Number3012236936-2024-000169
Device Sequence Number6963805
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474747029
UDI-Public(01)05050474747029(17)250912
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/03/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/12/2025
Device Model NumberDIU225
Device Catalogue NumberDIU225U145
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/05/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/28/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/18/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/03/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/12/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-