|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. JOURN ART INS BCS STD 3-4 LT10; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
74023242 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
05/23/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after a tka surgery had been performed on (b)(6) 2013, the patient underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2024, during which the patella was resurfaced using a 35 mm journey patella, and one (1) journ art ins bcs std 3-4 lt10 was exchanged for an 11mm insert.The reason leading to the revision surgery is unknown.The patient's current health status is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed that postoperative patient care and directions and warnings to patients by physicians are extremely important.Protected weight bearing with external support is recommended for a period of time to allow healing.Normal daily activity may be resumed at the physician¿s direction.Also, warnings and precautions state that the patient should be warned of surgical risks, and made aware of possible adverse effects.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.A review of previous actions concluded that there is a higher than expected risk of revision surgery for the first generation of journey bcs systems.It was recommended to undertake a field safety corrective action to inform surgeons of the higher expected risk of revision, and ensure clear communication that the device should only be used for polyethylene exchange revision of journey bcs total knee constructs where the femoral component and tibial baseplate are well fixed.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.No details about the cause of the revision surgery were provided, therefore no factors that can contribute can be delineated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|