| Catalog Number |
SK6535M |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Material Deformation (2976)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/21/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, a image was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 02/2025) h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the highly calcified artery, the device was allegedly sectioned during operation.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the highly calcified artery, the device was allegedly sectioned during operation.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one photo was provided and reviewed.The photo shows the seeker device in its packaging.The labeling details match with the information available in trackwise.Complete detachment of a section near the distal part of the catheter is seen.Additionally, one xray image was provided and reviewed.The image shows a stent within an artery and a seeker catheter in several in the stent.There is no wire within the catheter, and it is presumed to have ¿sectioned.¿ there is a sheath with a wire inside of it.One seeker device was returned for evaluation.Complete circumferential detachment was noted at the distal end of the catheter shaft.No marker band was noted on the catheter shaft.Due to the nature of the complaint, no functional testing was performed.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported detachment as a section of the catheter is seen completely detached in both the provided images and the returned sample.A definitive root cause for the alleged detachment could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 02/2025), g3.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one seeker device was returned for evaluation.Complete circumferential detachment was noted at the distal end of the catheter shaft.No marker band was noted on the catheter shaft.Due to the nature of the complaint, no functional testing was performed.One photo was provided and reviewed.The photo shows the seeker device in its packaging.The labeling details match with the information available in trackwise.Complete detachment of a section near the distal part of the catheter is seen.Additionally, one x-ray image was provided and reviewed.The image shows a stent within an artery and a seeker catheter in several in the stent.There is no wire within the catheter, and it is presumed to have 'sectioned¿.There is a sheath with a wire inside of it.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported detachment as a section of the catheter is seen completely detached in both the provided images and the returned sample.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: g3.H11: d4 (unique identifier (udi) #).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the highly calcified artery, the device was allegedly sectioned during operation.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|