• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. HD ENDOEYE LAPARO-THORACO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. HD ENDOEYE LAPARO-THORACO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number LTF-VH
Medical Device Problem Codes Peeled/Delaminated (1454); Noise, Audible (3273)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device evaluation is ongoing.Should additional relevant information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was observed during the device inspection, that the laparo-thoraco videoscope exhibited adhesive peeling of the objective lens tip and tip image noise.There were no reports of patient involvement.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide the results of the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been over seventeen (17) years since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, it is not possible to establish the root cause.However, is assumed that the image noise error was caused by damage to the image sensor unit or failure of mounted parts on the electrical board due to stress from use, external factors, or handling.And for the issue with glue of the objective lens is peeled off, it is assumed that the defective item is caused by stress from use, external factors, or handling.The event can be detected/prevented by following the instructions for use which state: the inspection method for the suggested event is described in the instruction manual "chapter 3 preparation and inspection 3.6 inspection of the endoscopic system¿.Is confirmed that the inspection method for the suggested event is described in "chapter 3 preparation and inspection 3.2 preparation and inspection of the endoscope." in the operation manual.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HD ENDOEYE LAPARO-THORACO VIDEOSCOPE
Common Device Name
LAPARO-THORACO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key19581222
Report Number9610595-2024-12481
Device Sequence Number14269465
Product Code GCJ
UDI-Device Identifier04953170287015
UDI-Public04953170287015
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K080948
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Other
Device Model NumberLTF-VH
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/11/2024
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/14/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/16/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/21/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/18/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/22/2007
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-