|
This report is being submitted to report additional information.The following sections are being reported: d4: expiration date and unique identifier (udi) number.H2: if follow-up, what type.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer.H4: device manufacturer date.H6: type of investigation.H6: investigation findings.H6: investigation conclusions.H10: additional narratives/data.Zimvie received one healing abutment for evaluation.Visual evaluation of the as returned device identified the abutment with signs of use, and slight wear however, the abutment engaged/seats as intended with an in-house zimmer implant during a functional test.No malfunction.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number no deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root causes determined from the investigation are incorrect techniques used - customer error.Therefore, based on the available information, and functional testing a device malfunction did not occur.The reported event was non-verifiable with all the available information and without return of all devices involved.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the product was nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|