|
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETABULAR CUP HAP SIZE 48/54; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
74122154 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Biocompatibility (2886); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Metal Related Pathology (4530); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after the plaintiff underwent a tha mom surgery in (b)(6) 2015, he experienced an unspecified malfunction.The patient is scheduled to undergo revision surgery in 2 weeks.Patient current health status is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section h3, h6: it was reported that after the patient underwent a total hip arthroplasty metal on metal surgery, he experienced an unspecified malfunction.The patient is scheduled to undergo revision surgery.Patient current health status is unknown.As of today, the devices, all of which were used in treatment, remain implanted and therefore cannot be tested.As no device part and batch numbers were provided for investigation, a complaint history review, manufacturing record review, or escalation actions review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.The review of the product's current ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.Without details of the type of symptoms experienced by the patient, it is not possible to evaluate the risk file for the device.No further actions are required at this time.To the date, no clinically sufficient data was provided to perform a medical investigation.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Based on the limited information provided we are unable to speculate on specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after the patient underwent a bhr tha surgery in (b)(6) 2015, the patient experienced pain.A revision surgery was performed on the (b)(6) 2024, where minimal synovium that was slightly gray was noted, which can be seen as metallosis.All implants were replaced for competitors devices.Patient current health status is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: d4 (catalog number, lot number, expiration date, unique identifier (udi) #), d10, h4.Corrected data: b5, d1, h6 (health effect - clinical code).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected data: a3, h6 (medical device problem code).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section h6, type of investigation and investigation findings, corrected.Section h11 updated.Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H11: as of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the alleged devices was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the cup and the head.This failure will continue to be monitored via routine trending.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions are required.The available medical documents were reviewed.A clinical root cause could not be determined.Although the pain and slightly gray synovium are consistent with the reported metallosis a clinical root cause cannot be definitively concluded.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|