|
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN_TRIDENT X3 LINER; PROSTHESIS, HIP, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED OR UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
UNK_JR |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Noise, Audible (3273)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Loss of Range of Motion (2032)
|
| Date of Event |
05/29/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An evaluation of the device cannot be performed as the device was not returned to the manufacturer.Should additional information become available it will be reported in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.The following devices were also listed in this report: device name# accolade 127 stem; cat#unk_shc ; lot#unknown.Device name#trident tritanium hemispherical solid black shell ; cat#unk_shc ; lot#unknown.Device name#biolox delta v40 ceramic head ; cat#unk_shc ; lot#unknown.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
"i have been experiencing complaints about strain on my left leg for some time now, stryker system is implanted.I experience pain and limitation when straining and a thumping sound when rotating that leg.I also have others pain complaints developed that i do not want to go into further detail about now.In my opinion there may be something wrong with the insert and i'm trying thereto gain clarity.So far i have been told that the 'prosthesis is correct', but there is literature research on how often misalignment occurs of the insert is missed.And there is literature about the x-ray image that consistent with a misplacement or misalignment.Now i would like to ask your company what you think about the condition of the insert (tridentx3 polyethylene insert) of my full hip replacement on the attached x ray.As you can see, there are two translucencies visible on the left and right of the femoral head.As i see it, these are characteristics of misalignment/misplacement: elliptical (wear?) spaces.In addition i suspect some crescent-shaped radiolucency under the shell (tritanium hemispherical solid black shell), which in my opinion could come from micro motion and non-ingrowth of the shell there.Anyway, i see one translucency around the femoral head (biolox delta ceramic v40 femoral head), indicating space between the femoral head and the insert that does not belong there to be.I have an x-ray from both the standing position and the extended position position attached and have on another version of the x-ray with arrows and circles indicate which areas are involved.There is one near the green arrow screw? the voice is the accolade ii 127* hip voice.The ratio of the shell to the insert is 52m: 32mm.As i understand it is the maximum space (jd?) between shell and insert of stryker modular parts 12mm, so that with a shell of 52 an insert should fit 40mm.So i ask the question: isn't the insert too small? used? this means that the space for the femur head v40 - also 32mm - increases (elliptical?) to move originated? i hope you will answer this.Of course i will also go elsewhere i advise you to study the x-ray images and i will report my findings elsewhere also present to experts.But i thought it would be logical to ask you yourself.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An event regarding other involving an trident liner was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional, and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device remains implanted.Clinician review: a review with a clinical consultant indicates "no medical records, operative notes, or sequential x-rays were provided for review.The findings are based on the patient complaints from the pi report as well as x-rays that are undated and unlabeled.The x-rays do not show any gross abnormalities of the construct.There is no ability to assess the patient complaints based on the data provided.Event confirmation: the event, the patient complaints, cannot be confirmed without additional medical information.There is no gross abnormality seen on the x-rays provided.Root cause: the root cause of the patient complaints cannot be ascertained with the materials provided." product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: a review with a clinical consultant indicates "no medical records, operative notes, or sequential x-rays were provided for review.The findings are based on the patient complaints from the pi report as well as x-rays that are undated and unlabeled.The x-rays do not show any gross abnormalities of the construct.There is no ability to assess the patient complaints based on the data provided.Event confirmation: the event, the patient complaints, cannot be confirmed without additional medical information.There is no gross abnormality seen on the x-rays provided.Root cause: the root cause of the patient complaints cannot be ascertained with the materials provided." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.The following devices were also listed in this report: device name#: size 4 accolade ii 127 deg; cat#: size 4 accolade ii 127 deg.Device name#: primary trit hemi solidback cup 52mm; cat#: 500-03-52d.Device name#: delta v-40 ceramic head 32/-4; cat#: 6570-0-032.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
"i have been experiencing complaints about strain on my left leg for some time now, stryker system is implanted.I experience pain and limitation when straining and a thumping sound when rotating that leg.I also have others pain complaints developed that i do not want to go into further detail about now.In my opinion there may be something wrong with the insert and i'm trying thereto gain clarity.So far, i have been told that the 'prosthesis is correct', but there is literature research on how often misalignment occurs of the insert is missed.And there is literature about the x-ray image that consistent with a misplacement or misalignment.Now i would like to ask your company what you think about the condition of the insert (tridentx3 polyethylene insert) of my full hip replacement on the attached x ray.As you can see, there are two translucencies visible on the left and right of the femoral head.As i see it, these are characteristics of misalignment/misplacement: elliptical (wear?) spaces.In addition, i suspect some crescent-shaped radiolucency under the shell (tritanium hemispherical solid black shell), which in my opinion could come from micro motion and non-ingrowth of the shell there.Anyway, i see one translucency around the femoral head (biolox delta ceramic v40 femoral head), indicating space between the femoral head and the insert that does not belong there to be.I have an x-ray from both the standing position and the extended position attached and have on another version of the x-ray with arrows and circles indicate which areas are involved.There is one near the green arrow screw? the voice is the accolade ii 127* hip voice.The ratio of the shell to the insert is 52m: 32mm.As i understand it is the maximum space (jd?) between shell and insert of stryker modular parts 12mm, so that with a shell of 52 an insert should fit 40mm.So i ask the question: isn't the insert too small? used? this means that the space for the femur head v40 - also 32mm - increases (elliptical?) to move originated? i hope you will answer this.Of course i will also go elsewhere i advise you to study the x-ray images and i will report my findings elsewhere also present to experts.But i thought it would be logical to ask you yourself.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|