• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO BCT COBE SPECTRA; COBE SPECTRA RBCX SET

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO BCT COBE SPECTRA; COBE SPECTRA RBCX SET Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 70600
Medical Device Problem Codes No Apparent Adverse Event (3189); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Anemia (1706); Fever (1858); Itching Sensation (1943); Rash (2033); Thrombocytopenia (4431); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/19/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Lot number, manufacture and expiry date are not available at this time.Investigation is in process, a follow-up report will be provided.Citation: matsui, h.M., hazama, s., nakajima, m., xu, m., matsukuma, s., tokumitsu, y., shindo, y., tomochika, s., yoshida, s., iida, m., suzuki, n., takeda, s., yoshino, s., ueno, t., oka, m., & nagano, h.(2020).Novel adjuvant dendritic cell therapy with transfection of heat-shock protein 70 messenger rna for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase i/ii prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy/cancer immunology and immunotherapy, 70(4), 945¿957.Https://doi.Org/10.1007/s00262-020-02737-y.
 
Event or Problem Description
Per journal article "novel adjuvant dendritic cell therapy with transfection of heat-shock protein 70 messenger rna for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase i/ii prospective randomized controlled clinical trial".By matsui, h.M., hazama, s., nakajima, m., xu, m., matsukuma, s., tokumitsu, y., shindo, y., tomochika, s., yoshida, s., iida, m., suzuki, n., takeda, s., yoshino, s., ueno, t., oka, m., nagano, h.Among the safety population cohort, aes were reported in 39 patients (88.6%); of these, 35 patients (79.5%) had mild to moderate aes (grade 1 or 2).The frequency of all aes between the two groups was comparable.Most of these aes were afected by background liver disease.In the dc group, two patients had grade 3 anemia and two patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia.However, there was no signifcant change in liver function in these patients.Furthermore, although these patients met the inclusion criteria, anemia and thrombocytopenia were more prominent before dc treatment than in other cases.So, these aes were unlikely to be associated with dc therapy and likely to be related to liver cirrhosis or splenomegaly, which developed during the chronic course of the disease.The frequency of grade 3 aes between the two groups was also comparable.No patient in the dc group developed local skin reactions.Two patients of the dc group experienced transient fever, one patient of the dc group developed a grade 2 rash and one patient of the dc group developed grade 1 pruritus.These immune-related aes were well tolerated (table 2).We also evaluated aes associated with apheresis, but no aes of grade 2 or higher, including hypotension, bleeding, and air embolism were observed specific details, such as patient information and outcome, were not included in the article for these events, therefore this report is being provided as a summary of the events.It is unknown at this time if medical intervention was required for these events the collection set is not available for return because it was discarded by the customer.
 
Event or Problem Description
Per journal article "novel adjuvant dendritic cell therapy with transfection of heat-shock protein 70 messenger rna for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase i/ii prospective randomized controlled clinical trial".By matsui, h.M., hazama, s., nakajima, m., xu, m., matsukuma, s., tokumitsu, y., shindo, y., tomochika, s., yoshida, s., iida, m., suzuki, n., takeda, s., yoshino, s., ueno, t., oka, m., nagano, h.Among the safety population cohort, aes were reported in 39 patients (88.6%); of these, 35 patients (79.5%) had mild to moderate aes (grade 1 or 2).The frequency of all aes between the two groups was comparable.Most of these aes were afected by background liver disease.In the dc group, two patients had grade 3 anemia and two patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia.However, there was no signifcant change in liver function in these patients.Furthermore, although these patients met the inclusion criteria, anemia and thrombocytopenia were more prominent before dc treatment than in other cases.So, these aes were unlikely to be associated with dc therapy and likely to be related to liver cirrhosis or splenomegaly, which developed during the chronic course of the disease.The frequency of grade 3 aes between the two groups was also comparable.No patient in the dc group developed local skin reactions.Two patients of the dc group experienced transient fever, one patient of the dc group developed a grade 2 rash and one patient of the dc group developed grade 1 pruritus.These immune-related aes were well tolerated (table 2).We also evaluated aes associated with apheresis, but no aes of grade 2 or higher, including hypotension, bleeding, and air embolism were observed specific details, such as patient information and outcome, were not included in the article for these events, therefore this report is being provided as a summary of the events.It is unknown at this time if medical intervention was required for these events the collection set is not available for return because it was discarded by the customer.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being filed to provide additional information in h.6 and h.11.Corrected information is provided in d.4.Lot number, manufacture and expiry date are not available at this time.Further evaluation of this event has determined that the device did not cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, nor is there a likely potential for death or serious injury associated with this event based on additional investigational information.It was confirmed that there were no aes associated with apheresis that were greater than grade 2 or higher.No further reporting will be provided as this does not represent a reportable event.¿¿ citation: matsui, h.M., hazama, s., nakajima, m., xu, m., matsukuma, s., tokumitsu, y., shindo, y., tomochika, s., yoshida, s., iida, m., suzuki, n., takeda, s., yoshino, s., ueno, t., oka, m., & nagano, h.(2020).Novel adjuvant dendritic cell therapy with transfection of heat-shock protein 70 messenger rna for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase i/ii prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy/cancer immunology and immunotherapy, 70(4), 945¿¿¿957.Https://doi.Org/10.1007/s00262-020-02737-y.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COBE SPECTRA
Common Device Name
COBE SPECTRA RBCX SET
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO BCT
lakewood CO 80215
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO BCT
10810 w. collins ave
lakewood CO 80215
Manufacturer Contact
scot hilden
10810 w. collins ave
lakewood, CO 80215
MDR Report Key19606505
Report Number1722028-2024-00274
Device Sequence Number15042687
Product Code GKT
UDI-Device Identifier05020583706002
UDI-Public05020583706002
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
BK080035
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Literature
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/25/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number70600
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/04/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/07/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/25/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/09/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-