|
It was reported that a perforation, pericardial effusion (pe) and cardiac tamponade occurred; procedure was cancelled.During a watchman left atrial appendage closure (laac) procedure, a versacross connect access solution kit was selected for use.The physician was able to successfully cross the interatrial septum (ias) with the versacross rf pigtail wire with no issues (inferior and mid/posterior).However, since the patients ias was thick, it caused the versacross dilator and watchman sheath to get hung up.In an attempt to cross and dilate it, the physician increased his forward pressure on the ias with the devices, and they both suddenly and unexpectedly advanced through the ias, which lead to the dilator went too far into the left atrium (la) and perforated the posterior wall of the la.The tip of the versacross rf wire was protruding out of the dilator at this time.A pericardial effusion was immediately noticed via transesophageal echocardiogram (tee), and the patient's blood pressure dropped significantly, indicating a cardiac tamponade.The procedure was then cancelled.Therefore, a cardiothoracic (ct) surgeon was immediately notified, and heparin was reversed.The physician attempted a pericardiocentesis but struggled to get the equipment into the pericardial space.The patient vitals were being maintained with medication while the physician continued to navigate into the pericardial space.By the time a drain was properly placed, the pericardial space had thrombosed enough to significantly slow the bleeding from the perforation and the patient's hemodynamics started to stabilize without the use of extra medication.Due to the blood in the pericardial space being mostly clotted, not much fluid/blood was able to drain.At this time, the physician and ct surgeon discussed the options and ultimately decided the patient did not require surgical intervention seeing as they were stable and the blood in the pericardial space was thrombosed.The patient was then sent to the surgical intensive care unit (sicu) while still intubated and with the drain remaining in place.The pe occurred at 10:15am, at approximately 3:30pm the physician stated that they were doing well, and they were planning to extubate later.The patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2024.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis (disposed).Prior to the procedure, there was evidence of a baseline pe on tee.The patient was not on warfarin or any antiplatelet drugs at the time of procedure.A non-boston scientific introducer was used to gain femoral access.No other issues were reported.
|