• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZIMMER DENTAL IMP,TSV,6.0,8,MTX,MG; DENTAL IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZIMMER DENTAL IMP,TSV,6.0,8,MTX,MG; DENTAL IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number TSVT6B8
Medical Device Problem Code Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Unspecified Infection (1930); Inflammation (1932)
Date of Event 05/19/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It is reported that the implant placement went uneventful- isq-72, pt felt sore post-op and implant was mobile at 2 weeks, therefore it was removed due to allergic reaction and infection.Symptoms as a result of the event: inflammation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4).G4: pma/510(k) number k101880.
 
Event or Problem Description
No further event information available at the time of this report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Zimvie received one (1) tsvt6b8, (imp,tsv,6.0,8,mtx,mg) for evaluation.Visual evaluation of the as returned device identified the implant with signs of use, markings from removal and debris on its external threads.No damage identified or signs of malfunction that would have contributed to the reported events.Outer measurements match drawing.Functional testing to recreate the reported event could not be performed due to the nature of the device & event.This complaint refers to the specific device being investigated for this complaint record.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number 1241829.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported events, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number 1241829 for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Review completed utilizing keywords: ¿allergic reaction¿ & "infection" the customer did not submit images for the reported events.Based on the investigation and risk management file review as per rmf rm-00541-haz rev.4, the most likely root causes determined from the investigation are external factors (i.E.Patient conditions).Refer to attached summary investigation for ¿infection.¿ therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction did not occur.The reported events were non-verifiable with all the available information.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.Similar complaints for implant infection have been previously investigated.Refer to attached summary investigation.Visual and dimensional evaluations of the previously returned product have not identified or suggested manufacturing non-conformances.While non-conformances were identified for some lots during manufacturing record reviews, the documented disposition actions for each did not suggest the likely release of non-conforming product.Zimvie quality management system (qms) has controls in place to ensure the distribution of conforming product.Additionally, all device history record reviews verified that each implant was sterilized per procedure for every device.All complaint data used for the summary investigation was found to be conforming and did not meet capa/hhe/d/ or any further escalations.Therefore, there were no complaints which confirmed a manufacturing or design related issue that did or could cause or contribute to the reported event.At this time, the complaint investigation has been completed and the record will be closed.If additional information is received, the record will be re-opened for further evaluation.The following sections have been updated: b4: date of this report.G3: date received by manufacturer.G6: checked "follow-up." h2: checked follow-up type.H3: changed "no" to "yes." h6: entered evaluation codes.H10: added manufacturer narrative.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMP,TSV,6.0,8,MTX,MG
Common Device Name
DENTAL IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZIMMER DENTAL
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens FL 33410
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZIMMER DENTAL
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens FL 33410
Manufacturer Contact
carlos gordian-arroyo
4555 riverside drive
palm beach gardens, FL 33410
5619713230
MDR Report Key19611687
Report Number0002023141-2024-02127
Device Sequence Number15029036
Product Code DZE
UDI-Device Identifier00889024019911
UDI-Public(01)00889024019911(17)260131(10)1241829
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K101977
Exemption Number5645646
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/05/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/30/2026
Device Catalogue NumberTSVT6B8
Device Lot Number1241829
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/28/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/26/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/07/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/31/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight91 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-