• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX673T
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 05/27/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: during the investigation, scratches on the outer housing of the valve, but no significant deformations or damage was determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the valve is permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the vave of malfunction, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested in the horizontal position.The results show that the valve operates within the accepted tolerances in the horizontal position.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is fully operational and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Internal inspection : after dismantling of the valve, no deposits were found in progav 2.0.Result : based on our investigation results, we can determine no functional deviations.The cause of the explantation is not known to us at the time of the examination.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 (#fx673t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2023.No product problem or patient data were submitted by the complainant, but the patient underwent a revision procedure.The complainant device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key19613719
Report Number3004721439-2024-00167
Device Sequence Number6948545
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906502270
UDI-Public4041906502270
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K190174
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/26/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberFX673T
Device Catalogue NumberFX673T
Device Lot Number20066299
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/04/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/04/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/26/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/05/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-