|
Visual inspection: during the investigation, no significant deformations or damage of the valve were determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the progav 2.0 has a blackage while the paedisa and the sprung reservoir are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of over-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the paedisa operates within the permissible tolerance in both positions.Because the progav 2.0 is not permeable, a computer controlled test is not possible adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is not adjustable.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function operates as expected; however, the breaking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in all valves.Results: based on our investigation results, we can determine an blockage and a non-adjustability at the progav 2.0.The visible deposits in the valves have led to the functional impairment.Deposits caused by substances naturally present in the patient's body, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.Even small amounts of organic material can affect the integrity of the valve.Based on our investigation results, we can determine visible deposits in the paedisa and in the sprung reservoir.The deposits had no effect on the specifications at the time of the investigation.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
|