| Catalog Number |
ATG80224 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Missing Information (4053)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/28/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 10/2026) h11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that prior to an angioplasty procedure, it was noticed that the three codes with the information allegedly does not have barcodes.There was no patient contact.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that prior to an angioplasty procedure, it was noticed that the three codes with the information allegedly does not have barcodes.There was no patient contact.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.However, one electronic photo was provided for review.The photo shows a portion of an atlas gold label with lot and product information matching the reported information in trackwise.No barcode can be seen on the label.The cause of the reported event is likely this change in labeling being unknown to the reporter.Labeling review: atlas gold label artwork document was reviewed.Revision 3 was the first revision to include a barcode on the outer product labeling.Revision 2 did not contain this barcode on the label.Revision 3 was implemented at the manufacturing facility on 10/31/2023.Per the device dhr review, this lot was manufactured and released on 10/05/2023.Therefore, this lot would have used.Rev.2, which did not contain a barcode.As a result of the labeling review, it can be determined that no labeling issue can be confirmed as the product labeling contains all correct information based on the date of manufacture.H10: d4 (expiration date: 10/2026), g3, h6 (method).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|