|
|
| Catalog Number |
0112650 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Rash (2033); Skin Burning Sensation (4540)
|
| Date of Event |
06/18/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, patient underwent a two-part procedure on (b)(6) 2021 which included a bilateral direct inguinal hernia repair with implant of a bard flat mesh cut into two pieces and used on both the right and left groin; a urolift system procedure for enlarged prostate with implant on non-bard/bd suture/metal implants.As reported about one year post implant patient started to experience a rash all over his legs, feet, and abdominal area around his umbilicus, experiencing excruciating pain on the bottom of his feet and skin burning.It was reported that the patient has had cellulitis on numerous occasions on his legs and feet.It was reported that the patient has undergone testing (ct scan and mirs) and as reported per patient's allergist, "patient developed a horrific rash that has not been responsive to any significant treatment since he had the mesh place.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As reported, about 1-year post-implant of the flat mesh, patient had rash on legs, feet, abdomen, and pain in feet.Based on the information provided at this time, no conclusion can be made as to the degree to which the device, may be causing or contributing the patient¿s reported symptoms.A sample mesh has been provided for reactivity testing.The testing has not been scheduled at this time; we have requested the test results be provided once testing has been completed.When/if the results of the testing are provided a supplemental mdr will be submitted to document the results.Allergic reaction is a known inherent risk of hernia repair surgery and is listed in the adverse reactions section of the instructions for use, supplied with the device as a possible complication.Review of manufacturing records shows product was made to specification.To date, this is the only reported complaint for this manufacturing lot of (b)(4) released for distribution in oct 2020.Note, the date of event (18-jun-2022) is considered to be a best estimate based.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As reported, about 1-year post-implant of the flat mesh, patient had rash on legs, feet, abdomen, and pain in feet.Based on the information provided at this time, no conclusion can be made as to the degree to which the device, may be causing or contributing the patient¿s reported symptoms.A sample mesh has been provided for reactivity testing.The testing has not been scheduled at this time; we have requested the test results be provided once testing has been completed.When/if the results of the testing are provided a supplemental mdr will be submitted to document the results.Allergic reaction is a known inherent risk of hernia repair surgery and is listed in the adverse reactions section of the instructions for use, supplied with the device as a possible complication.Review of manufacturing records shows product was made to specification.To date, this is the only reported complaint for this manufacturing lot of (b)(4) units released for distribution in oct 2020.Note, the date of event ((b)(6) 2022) is considered to be a best estimate based.Addendum: this is an addendum to the initial mdr submitted.This supplemental mdr is submitted to document the reactivity test result.Reactivity testing has been performed and as reported the results were negative as there was no reaction to the mesh sample.It is unknown, what is causing the patient's condition.However, based on reactivity testing performed the flat mesh was not the cause of the reaction the patient experienced one year post implant.Updated fields: b4, d4, g3, g6, h2, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, patient underwent a two-part procedure on (b)(6) 2021 which included a bilateral direct inguinal hernia repair with implant of a bard flat mesh cut into two pieces and used on both the right and left groin; a urolift system procedure for enlarged prostate with implant on non-bard/bd suture/metal implants.As reported about one year post implant patient started to experience a rash all over his legs, feet, and abdominal area around his umbilicus, experiencing excruciating pain on the bottom of his feet and skin burning.It was reported that the patient has had cellulitis on numerous occasions on his legs and feet.It was reported that the patient has undergone testing (ct scan and mirs) and as reported per patient's allergist, "patient developed a horrific rash that has not been responsive to any significant treatment since he had the mesh place.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|