| Model Number |
E2450H |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare (1487); Arcing (2583); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
|
| Date of Event |
04/17/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D10 concomitant product: e1455-6 16.51cm coated blade electrode (lot#: unknown); force fx-cs force fx 110v x1 (serial#: (b)(6)).Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, during bilateral breast reconstruction with exchange of tissue expanders for gel implants, patient experienced a burn in an area not being cauterized.The burn appeared to occur by electrical conductivity through the base of where the tip of the cautery was connected to the hand piece.Superficial 2nd degree burn treated with topical ointment.Bactriacin zinc-polymyxin b (polysporin) and antimicrobial water resistant bandage (mepilex) and surgical bra was also placed per usual procedure.Cut/coag settings were 30/30.Customer also reported that the removal of the electrode has been quite difficult.Customer exchanged electrodes often throughout the procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: d9, g3, h3, h6 medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.The evaluation found no potentially contributing factors, and the sample met all related specifications.It was reported that there was a condition of arcing /sparking; the device was difficult to disassemble and the device was also related to a burn.The reported issues could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be identified because no related problem was detected with the device.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|